|
| quote: | Originally posted by toolman667
It's called vested interests.
We have High-Fructose Corn Syrup in place of "real sugar" in everything that we consume in America.
So Coke and Pepsi are getting rich off of it, and farmers aren't even growing their full potential of crops, americans are getting fatter, and dumber, not learning the problems. All the while, the big corporations (coke and pepsi, plenty others) lobby more and more for bills in their favor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vested_interest |
im not an expert by any means on this subject matter, so i hesitate to comment, but im willing to bet the situation is far more complicated than you're suggesting. the tariff/subsidy issue with american farmers is more than just corporate greed, and the farming lobbyists are pretty damn powerful in their own right.
| quote: | Originally posted by shaolin_Z
Simple Answer: Microsoft doesn't profit from wars, they're part of a much smaller industry with much less influence. What's so hard to understand about that? |
i dont understand what your point is? yes, microsoft doesn't profit from wars, so???
also, i hate to break it to everyone, but the "military industrial complex" (haha, i love that catchcry) make plenty of money in "peace time" as well. no really, they do. the US sells so much stuff to its allies its ridiculous. even to peace-loving countries like good ol' australia.
microsoft on the other hand profit during rain, hail or shine, and control the world's computer systems. that's a fair amount of power. yet, they couldn't use that evil corporate power to stay out of court and avoid hefty fines.
im not denying the power and influence of those with money, but its simply not as cut and dried as some of you make out. there are a billion and one interests all vying to be heard in washington (or canberra) and the idea that every successive government is beholden to one group of powerbrokers isnt credible. at least not to me.
___________________
|