quote:

Originally posted by donnybrasco ^^^You have VERY selective absorption of what you read in my posts. Simply stated; You want to hold Bush to the flame, no matter what. Have fun hating the Republican party and thinking that your party is so much better. I'm happy for you.

LOL, again, you address me as a person, instead of my arguments. Another ad hominem fallacy. These little shots at my personality really does not good for your side of the argument.

Secondly, I fully understood what you said, and even restated your claim so it could understood in logical terms...And when we examine your claim in logical terms, it results in an "ad ignorantium" APPEAL TO IGNORANCE, which is a logical fallacy...

"""If you can't prove that something is false then it must be true."""

"""Saddam acted as if he had WMDs, therefore Bush is not responsible for thinking Saddam has WMDs."""

How many times do I have to cite logic theory before you back off your logical fallacy?



Also, your comment of, "Have fun hating the Republican party and thinking that your party is so much better. I'm happy for you."

I'de highly suggest backing off the personal attacks which lend no credence to your position, especially against a logical argument. I am a registered Republican, and will be voting in the Republican primary. Again, you don't know me... Address my arguments, not me.

We can play this game all day, I'll just repeat the argument until you address it, then I'll give you a rebuttal, but until you address my arguments specifically, I'll keep calling you out on your logical fallacies...