|
| quote: | Originally posted by RJT
I also think it's a mistake to describe the cost of reproduction as negligible, because it's really not the reproduction that matters, but rather the production of the original intellectual property. |
The cost of copying a digital file is negligible. But I also agree with you that the reproduction itself is not the most important issue.
| quote: | | Your argument would seem to make the case that stealing music via CD or vinyl qualifies as theft, while stealing music in any digital format doesn't - I simply don't think that's the case. |
You're prejudicing the debate by using the term "stealing" throughout. Not fair.
If I see a painting for sale, then go and paint an exact replica of it, have I stolen the original painting? I don't think so, but that's the sort of thinking that is implied by the idea that copyright infringement is "theft."
|