 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Lebezniatnikov
Stupidity Annoys Me

Registered: Feb 2004
Location: DC
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Q5echo
i think Senators make lousy choices, yes. thats not to say a Senator couldn't ever be an effective POTUS but among these three?
i guess of the three choices we have, based on what we've already discussed, i think you'd have to agree that Obama is comparitively lacking. |
That depends entirely on what your notion of relevant experience is. As I've said before, there's never existed a single person who is truly qualified to be President of the United States. To paraphrase Susan Rice, no one person can ever be prepared to deal with the wide array of challenges and issues a President faces on a daily basis. So we look for specific qualifications, which vary widely based on personal preference.
If military experience is a qualification, John McCain surely must be close to an ideal candidate. If a history of political activism is important, Hillary Clinton isn't too shabby. And if you want commitment to a community, I'd argue you can't do too badly by Barack Obama.
You talk about his professional experiences being hollow, but to me it is one of his greatest assets. He has shown a commitment to improving the lives of the people from the beginning of his career, something I think that is lost upon John McCain and Hillary. I think if you asked them why they ran for office for the first time, you would get very different answers. Clinton and McCain would likely say something about serving God and country. Barack Obama would say to improve the lives of the people. Does that make him unpatriotic to imply that American lives need improving? No, I think that makes him qualified to be President.
___________________
|
|
May-05-2008 03:34
|
|
|
 |
 |
jerZ07002
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2006
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
That depends entirely on what your notion of relevant experience is. As I've said before, there's never existed a single person who is truly qualified to be President of the United States. To paraphrase Susan Rice, no one person can ever be prepared to deal with the wide array of challenges and issues a President faces on a daily basis. So we look for specific qualifications, which vary widely based on personal preference.
If military experience is a qualification, John McCain surely must be close to an ideal candidate. If a history of political activism is important, Hillary Clinton isn't too shabby. And if you want commitment to a community, I'd argue you can't do too badly by Barack Obama.
You talk about his professional experiences being hollow, but to me it is one of his greatest assets. He has shown a commitment to improving the lives of the people from the beginning of his career, something I think that is lost upon John McCain and Hillary. I think if you asked them why they ran for office for the first time, you would get very different answers. Clinton and McCain would likely say something about serving God and country. Barack Obama would say to improve the lives of the people. Does that make him unpatriotic to imply that American lives need improving? No, I think that makes him qualified to be President. |
mike bloomberg for president!!!
|
|
May-05-2008 04:40
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:58.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|