|
| quote: | Originally posted by jashic
You mean the 4x4 beat for the first 60 seconds, followed by a snare introduction and some tension grabbing in the next 60 seconds, followed by a 60 second mild melodic breakdown, followed by 120 seconds of slight harder beats and a more strenous riff all leading to a massive breakdown that lasts for 90 seconds and then follows up with a 120 second closing beats that get a little softer towards the end? |
LOL, yup! But there's still a bit more to it than that when it comes to my personal preference of techno to trance.
What bores me a bit about trance is probably what makes trance so exciting for so many other listeners.. That is, that it's beauty is self evident.. blatant even. This was fun for me at first, but after hearing hundreds of beautiful vocals and perfect melodies, and beautiful vocals and perfect melodies, and beautiful vocals and perfect melodies over the years, I think overt beauty became less special for me. I try not to be a total snob about it though. Different music does different things for the ears. Since trance is part of what got me into EDM in the first place I can't/won't disregard it, but I usually just check up on it and every now and then I'll come across a crazy track that sounds remarkably different from the rest. For the most part though, techno continues to surprise me with sounds and effects that I never thought could work well together, bass lines that drop when I don't expect them to, and plenty of other aspects that continue to push the limits of what my ears are able to comprehend and appreciate. 'course it has its fair share of 'safe' tracks, so to speak, but a lot of the more inspired tracks usually blow me away, and lately it's just been getting better and better 
|