|
| quote: | Originally posted by chinamon
if they dont want a certain person taking video for commercial use then that is enough reason... |
To what exactly are you referring as "commercial use?" The term commercial implies, well, commerce - something being bought or sold. He's already stated that he doesn't profit in any way from these videos (and honestly, how could he?). You keep using that phrase but it doesn't seem to be applicable here.
I understand where you're coming from, that you paid your dues and went through a lot of hardship in order to get your media privileges and that he was essentially getting a free ride. Rules are rules, and it is the club management's prerogative to decide who gets to do what on their property. No justification or explanation is required.
However, given the circumstances, the history, and the fact that the Guvernment has probably benefited in some way, no matter how small, from the free PR, an explanation could be reasonably expected, especially when asked directly.
You're asserting that the Guvernment staff acted within their rights. No one is disputing that. What we are saying is that they acted unprofessionally. A one-paragraph response by e-mail that would have taken somebody all of 5 minutes to type up would have diffused any hostility and avoided a situation such as this thread, which in my opinion is already bad PR given the number of people here who go to that club.
There's nothing to be gained from refusing to communicate as long as you're not being harassed. Simply because one has the right to remain silent does not make it good business practice.
___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here
|
