|
| quote: | Originally posted by jupiterone
for fucks sake, it's not that bad. people are making this thing out to be a god damn behringer djx700 when really it's quite a solid piece of gear if you take care of it.
honestly, i'd go A&H, but there is really nothing wrong with going pioneer for the effects, you're mixing in your bedroom, oh god, all those invisible people in your bedroom won't be enjoying your mix because it's not A&H sound quality. give me a break. you're mixing in your bedroom, not fucking cocoon club |
Actually is that bad simply because of the quality vs cost ratio. For that money the DJM800 should bring you a fucking cup of tea in the morning and have your dinner waiting when you get home.
Ok, it's not that bad a mixer but it really isn't that great.
It's build quality is average at best (but better than the abysmal 500/600), the EQ is OK if a little unprecise and broad, the FX are toys, the faders don't last and all this for the privilege of shelling out $1300!!!
Don't get me wrong - pioneer CDJ's are clearly the best choice for CD decks - they really got them right and are reasonable on pricing vs. quality and function.
But with the 800 You are paying for all marketing that pioneer do.
Allen and Heath have way better sonic and build quality, faders that don't bleed and they don't sound like crap when shit DJ's redline them for the whole set (as often happens with DJM's).
|