 |
|
|
|
 |
Zak McKracken
Trance
Registered: Jun 2003
Location:
|
|
|
real killah hill breaks is the shit, for those who doesnt know thats new york gangsta prog, so yeah east. west is emo house only, like snoop proggy prog.
|
|
Mar-21-2009 15:43
|
|
|
 |
 |
Zak McKracken
Trance
Registered: Jun 2003
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
Is that just a bunch of random words you thought up? |
no
|
|
Mar-21-2009 17:18
|
|
|
 |
 |
flutlicht junky
in das haus

Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Bournemouth, UK
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Kenny.K
Hmmm, the eternal question. A poster the other day, I think it might have been MrJiveBoJingles... pointed out that what was considered trance in the mid-90's was very techy and percussive. He posted a couple of samples of which contained heaps of random percussion, acid lines, etc. If you listen to the 'trance' that is produced these days (big names - Armin, Rank 1, etc), it is significantly techy. Mind you this is coming from a guy that loves tech-trance so notices this.
To me trance is techy, apart from the purist's trance with is entirely fluffy and uplifting, and the purist's techno which is all percussion and no melody. Just an opinion but food for thought (just realises I'm on a trance purist forum )
|
Trance IS an offshoot of techno, genres aren't defined by a noise or types of noise, this isnt what makes them what they are.
Techno is repetition through rhythm and trance is repetition through melody. Trance didn't used to have big breakdowns etc. It used to do exactly what is says - roll on and on with the same melodys going. Its only when it clashed with house (anyone remember epic house? and the label Hooj Tunes?) that its developed a linear format where it progresses through builds to breakdown etc
___________________
Kuroi
@ web/Kuroi Music
@ myspace/Kuroi Music
promo track: Mirco de Govia - Voller Sterne (Kuroi Remix)
|
|
Mar-22-2009 00:02
|
|
|
 |
 |
SYSTEM-J
IDKFA.

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Manchester
|
|
|
Mar-22-2009 06:08
|
|
|
 |
 |
DJ Sound
Guest
Registered: Not Yet
Location:
|
|
|
hard trance is not big anymore haha...
but...you have the power to create WHATEVER you want...if you wanna make a song with a harder kick...make one =)
|
|
Mar-24-2009 19:29
|
|
|
 |
 |
DJ RANN
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2001
Location: Hollywood....
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by flutlicht junky
Trance IS an offshoot of techno, genres aren't defined by a noise or types of noise, this isnt what makes them what they are.
|
Jesus H Christ on a bicycle (with a basket)...What the fuck are you going on on about?
Sorry, didn't mean to be aggressive but this is like being in a history lesson hearing that Gandhi came up with E=MC2!!
so.....Techno and House were two strains of electronic music that grew (separately) from essentially disco and the combination of technological advancements in music equipment.
Techno was formed and House was formed, borrowing from and influencing each other.
The reason I make this distiction, is that Epic House, CAME from house. As a melodic and emotional form it was called uplifting house (I've got the memories and flyers to prove it), and the epic house moniker was bascially dropped when the huge melodic breakdowns subsided and the sound became more condensed (later around 96/97).
Then, uplifting house started to get called "Trance" (mainly because of certain magazines need to catagorize genres) and because in a lot of other European countries had something called Euro trance that was very simlilar uplifting house. I remember going record shopping in Germany and switzerland many times and had to change my terminology so instead of asking for uplifting house as I usually did in the UK, I would have to ask for (euro)trance.
Then mixmag exclaimed 98 as the "year of trance" (for the commercial reasons as listed above) and the uplifting house name was no more.
The point is, techno and house, even though having common roots are at their base, two completely different forms of electronic music. Trance as you know it, is a subgenre of House not Techno.
So, trance is NOT an offshoot of Techno, anymore than house is an offshoot of rock.
On another note before trance became the name for uplifting house/epic house, "Trance was this thing with sqiggly basslines fast BPM (140+) that was played in Goa and clubs like Whirlygig. This is what we all call psytrance now.
| quote: | Originally posted by flutlicht junky
Techno is repetition through rhythm and trance is repetition through melody. Trance didn't used to have big breakdowns etc. It used to do exactly what is says - roll on and on with the same melodys going. Its only when it clashed with house (anyone remember epic house? and the label Hooj Tunes?) that its developed a linear format where it progresses through builds to breakdown etc |
I don;t like this definition either - techno is so diverse in it's pure form that trying to shove it on to a pigeon hole like this just doesn;t work. Yes, you are right to a small degree, but that's like saying horses are only used for racing, because you see that a lot.
And yes, "trance" as you know it always had big breakdowns. In fact I can barely think of a single track in my record collection (that spans all of those definitions over time) that was bought while that music was called trance that doesn't have a fair breakdown. psytrance and epic house is a different matter if that's what you meant... 
Hooj was a great label and I knew the guys that ran it - in fact the record store in the UK I'm referring to above was owned by the 50% owner of Hooj. And yes, they called, after a point, what was being sold on Hooj as "uplifting house".
|
|
Mar-24-2009 19:59
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 21:56.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|