Ayn Rand is a fantastic writer, which is why everyone loves her novels - but the philosophy, if viewed through a critical lens, is utter tripe.
Pkc nailed it in his first post - it's impractical and dangerous to base a society on the needs and desires of the individual. I attended a lecture by the President of the Objectivist Society last year, and it literally frightened me when he described his view of the future.
___________________
May-14-2009 12:01
Lebezniatnikov
Stupidity Annoys Me
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: DC
quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
She didn't really know much about the philosophers she attacked. Just to give one example, she had a well-known hatred for Kant and Nietzsche, yet for some reason Kantian and Nietzschean ideas pop up repeatedly in her books.
Haha, yeah, this is especially true for Nietzsche.
___________________
May-14-2009 12:02
Lebezniatnikov
Stupidity Annoys Me
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: DC
quote:
Originally posted by Zild
plain and simple it IS. if you don't have the capacity to understand that well i'm not surprised.
i don't have the time nor do you have the desire for me to properly educate you but i can guarantee given that education you would realize there is much more creativity and beauty in upper level mathematics than you will find in all of Da Vinci's works of art.
___________________
May-14-2009 12:07
Domesticated
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location:
This is probably the best place to share this thought too...
I've been doing a criminology subject this year at university, where we've been looking at capitalism as a pathological structure. It's interesting, it made me reconsider my views of how effective western society really is. I did an essay on the beltway snipers (remember them?) and came to the conclusion that they were motivated mainly by the inherent pressures imposed by a capitalist system.
However, we also know that socialism and communism aren't successful in the long run, and this has led me to believe that we are yet to discover a societal structure worth maintaining. Thoughts?
May-14-2009 12:11
Lebezniatnikov
Stupidity Annoys Me
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: DC
What was it that Churchill said, "Democracy is a terrible societal structure, but it's the best we've found yet."
The economic system is obviously imperfect as well (credit bubbles, rampant inequality and poverty, etc.), but in practice free-market capitalism somehow works about as well as anything else we've tried. Except for Scandinavian state-led capitalism maybe.
___________________
May-14-2009 12:14
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion
Registered: Jul 2002
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by Domesticated
However, we also know that socialism and communism aren't successful in the long run, and this has led me to believe that we are yet to discover a societal structure worth maintaining. Thoughts?
isms are outmoded. there is no single social or political theory that can encompass the needs of all the people. you can't possibly tie millions of individuals with completely different ideals, motivations and goals into a social order where everything is peachy for everyone.
a mixed economy balanced by democratic government is the best i think we'll find until long after we're all dead.
___________________
May-14-2009 12:45
Lebezniatnikov
Stupidity Annoys Me
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: DC
Personally, I think any form of government or economy led by Barack Obama is the best, but I'm just a sheep.
___________________
May-14-2009 12:47
Meat187
Diese scheiß Katze
Registered: Dec 2007
Location: The Night's Plutonian Shore
I haven't read anything by her, but Atlas shrugged sounds like a colossal load of crap.
quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
What was it that Churchill said, "Democracy is a terrible societal structure, but it's the best we've found yet."
Democracy is one of the worst systems ever, but it's only advantage lead to it's popularity. It's stable. Democracy is a system of mediocrity, where a decisions actual worth, quality and usefulness has lost any relevance compared to it's popularity. And ironically it's stable because people believe they all have a certain influence, when indeed everybodys voice has been diluted to nothing at all.
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
isms are outmoded.
Indeed.
quote:
Originally posted by Domesticated
led me to believe that we are yet to discover a societal structure worth maintaining. Thoughts?
May-14-2009 14:35
R.j.
Di piú! di piú! di piú!
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: L, TX, USA
After reading The Fountainhead a second time, I've come to the conclusion that she has a ridiculously wooden prose, which made the second reading a lot more of a strain. Hummm...
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
maybe one day, when my young hatred of her has died down. im not sure how many pages i could get through though, she makes me so angry.
That's funny, because when I picked up Atlas Shrugged I was determined to hate it, and her. After 3 pages I was in love (with the book).
May-14-2009 21:23
Domesticated
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location:
We must also remember the regime that Rand lived under before going to America. I think you can forgive some of her more extreme ideas knowing that.