|
I have always considered time a measurement like any other - length, width, weight - they all have their (mostly arbitrary) units for measurement, and our units for time are no different as even a single second is standardized to the vibration of a cesium atom.
It seems to me that distance has its own units (point A to B) and that would be miles, inches, kilometers, meters, etc. Time seems more a measurement of movement than of distance, though it also seems to encompass entirely "still" (assuming such a thing is possible) entities or objects. But if our universe - our dimension, maybe - is indeed "curved" by our sensibilities, then time is merely a linear measurement of relevance to the existence of a perceptual phenomenon - not to imply that time is entirely linear or anything, but it sure makes it easier to consider it as such. 
But perhaps time is indeed a measure of distance (as you said, Moral, assuming the universe is a susceptible to topographical considerations), it just isn't the 'linear' distance we are normally acquainted with.
| quote: | Originally posted by Moral Hazard
which means that time is a real thing, not a perception. |
Hey, wait a second... 
___________________
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Last edited by Halcyon+On+On on May-28-2009 at 16:35
|