 |
|
|
|
 |
mfitterer1
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2008
Location: Oregon
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by sixofour.604
Except no one said test the tracks in mono, he said make the tracks in mono, ie. the final mixdown is mono only, for the sake of club system compatiability. Making the track mono compatiable DOES directly translate to "no unison, no panning, no use of the stereo field" So you can have bland dry tracks with heavy concern about being severaly limited by mono..or you can just say fuck all and make them stereo.
Do you listen to anything? No, because your a fucking moron.
Because I don't care about attention? When I release a track, I tell about 5 or 6 people. I throw it up on tindeck, and maby my myspace. Then I move on. I'm done with that track.
What is the merit in being famous or having recognition? I say there isn't an ounce of merit in it. But that is me. Unlike the entier EDM scene, I make muisc because I enjoy it, not because I want money or fame.
If I wanted to be famous, Id just copy deadmau5. |
He was speaking about testing your track in mono before rendering the final stereo wav.
And nobody said anything about becoming famous or making money. If you had the option of having 6 million people listen to your song and a large % of them like it or 6 people to listen to your song and however many like it; which would you choose? I mean you'd just be stupid to say you wouldn't want as many people as possible to enjoy your hard work and ideas
|
|
Aug-03-2009 11:34
|
|
|
 |
 |
Borbus
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Jul 2009
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Lolo
Well regardless on how it sounds, when making dance music, I tend to respect these rules, although some may break them, they come from a vinyl mastering company back in 1998:
1°) The kick is always center-panned, so is the low part of the bass.
2°) Stereo fx such as delays, reverb, etc, shouldn't be panned at more than 66% Left or Right. |
Yeah, the reason why this is very important for vinyl in particular is that a signal that is completely out of phase (ie. 180° out of phase) on the other channel will make the actual groove on the record come up too far making it too hard to track. It's one of the physical limitations of vinyl, but completely workable.
Diginut is right, you don't have to make your track be practically mono for it to sound ok mixed down to mono. Hard panning is absolutely fine, this will mix down to the centre (with a -3dB cut, see stereo panning laws) just fine. Stereo delay is simply panning and that is absolutely fine. Stereo reverb is a bit different, though, because if you turn the panning up to max it will actually have the signal 180° out of phase at some parts. If you mix together two identical signals that are 180° out of phase then they cancel each other out. It's a shame because it's a nice stereo effect.
But I still think you should worry /too/ much about it. It will sound worse in mono, but as long as the gist of it is still there ie. the leads and drums. Again, listen to the second half of Sandstorm and that mid bass part is 180° out so it disappears in mono. Come to think of it, I can't actually remember hearing that mid bass part in a club before...
Also here's a relevant article from SOS: http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/mar...eotechnique.htm
Also note, do not use stereo effects to make it sound good in headphones! Headphones are not stereo and need to be treated differently, or not at all as is the case most of the time. So just check to see if that ultra wide reverb is really worth it on a proper stereo system, because I've found that it usually isn't.
|
|
Aug-03-2009 12:03
|
|
|
 |
 |
flutlicht junky
in das haus

Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Bournemouth, UK
|
|
|
Aug-03-2009 12:41
|
|
|
 |
 |
kitphillips
is actually a guy.
Registered: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
Isn't this the point of mid side mixing anyway? I dont' really worry about it since I try to avoid reverb and unison to make my sounds fatter, but I was under the impression that m/s mixing eliminated this problem.
And this topic is discussed every time I log on here, search ffs.
___________________
New Mix: March 2010 Promo
Soundcloud|Facebook
|
|
Aug-03-2009 13:43
|
|
|
 |
 |
music2dance2
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2001
Location: U.K.
|
|
|
Aug-03-2009 14:25
|
|
|
 |
 |
sixofour.604
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2009
Location:
|
|
|
I guess the question is which label is it?
___________________
E = mc˛/2
E = mc˛ is the optical illusion of E = mc˛/2
Click me to find out why.
|
|
Aug-03-2009 16:09
|
|
|
 |
 |
derail
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Beatflux
My ass. |
The importance of mono has been mentioned on numerous occasions in this forum. Not quite every week, but reasonably frequently.
It's always good to revisit topics though, something new may come out of the discussion.
It's good to have an awareness of how your song could be heard - listening to it on high end speakers, on terrible speakers, on headphones, in a car, on radio (if possible), from another room, in mono (both sides summed together), in mono (just the left or right speaker).
You can't cater to everything, but it's good to be aware of how it could be experienced by listeners.
|
|
Aug-04-2009 00:56
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:08.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|