|
I chalk this up to each person drawing their own line in the sand. Sure, it's probably more rewarding from a personal standpoint and probably gains you more respect and admiration from your peers if you do it all yourself, but that comes along with its own set of compromises. I could probably spend the next 10 years writing an original symphony that is composed and performed entirely by me. The classical music purists would say "good god, that's horrid", a fairly large contingent would probably say "wow, that's pretty good considering he did it all himself", and most would probably say "you wasted how much of your life on this?". For me, I don't feel the need to do everything myself and, quite honestly, I get the most satisfaction out of songs that involve other people.
But, as far as samples go, I find it much easier and quicker to use one-shots for drums and SFX, and the occasional loop for percussion (e.g., latin percs, sometimes hihats, noise/background sounds). I often end up altering these sounds anyway, sometimes drastically and sometimes very minimally, and my ultimate goal is simply to get the sound or pattern that I'm after. So I don't really realize any substantial increase in self-satisfaction whether I use a straight sample, an altered sample, or something I made myself. I'm satisfied if it sounds the way I want it to sound.
___________________
cryophonik.com | facebook | soundcloud
Sonar Platinum | Ableton Live 9 | Logic Pro X | Access Virus TI2 Keyboard | Kurzweil PC3X | Nord Lead 4R | NI Maschine
|