 |
|
|
|
 |
The17sss
C.R.E.A.M.

Registered: May 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
|
|
|
| quote: | | The sample of speech-watchers in this poll was 45 percent Democratic and 18 percent Republican. |
Nice try. From the AP: Obamacare disapproval at 52%:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap...MuMZ1gD9AJST3O0
Rassmussen: 53% oppose Obamacare, 44% approve
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub..._plan_53_oppose
| quote: | | To play the President off as radically liberal on this one is just to not have your facts anywhere near correct. |
That statement could be even funnier than your CNN spin poll. The man with the most liberal voting record in the Senate is a moderate. Right! And I have some ocean front real estate I'd like to sell you.
| quote: | | Furthermore, your numbers are way off - 10-12 million uninsured illegals? Try 6-7 at max. There are a total of 11.9 million illegals in this country, of which roughly 50% are currently insured through their employer. |
And what makes you think YOU have the numbers correct? Obama himself has said 12-20 million, which seems to be the number everyone uses... but they don't really know. How do you also explain the number in his speech dropping from 47 to 30 million amid the "illegal immigrants" arguments?
| quote: | | What you're complaining about is that those currently insured won't have their coverage dropped by their privately-insured employers. Let's just be clear on that. The federal government does not, and will not, be subsidizing costs or providing insurance for the 6 million currently uninsured illegals. |
You're even talking like him now. "Let me be clear". What makes you so sure that you're right about the above statement?
You keep asking people if they've read the bill. Well now I'm asking you. Page 16 of the bill has a provision that makes private insurance illegal. Sure you can keep your plan that you like... until it expires, or the premium changes, or you change any form of coverage at any point. Then it will be impossible to get private insurance any longer. Read here--> http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArt...332548165656854
Why is this a surprise? Obama is on video speaking to the SEIU and AFL-CIO in 2003 and 2007 specifically saying he is a proponant of a single payer system, it's what he wants, it's what he will fight to get. Barney Frank has said on video that the public option will lead to it. Several other Democrats have as well. I have all the links to them saying as much. I've posted them before, and yet you ignore them or pretend like they never happened/don't matter. You're drinking in the Orwellian juice like crazy!
Edit: you should read this article by Duke University professor John David Lewis, as he breaks down a lot of the controversial questions into plain English for the layperson. Eye opening. Oh, and what's your take on HR 3200 forcing people to pay a $3800 fine if they don't buy insurance? That's what a moderate who believes in freedom of choice would do, right?
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/...l-actually-says
Last edited by The17sss on Sep-11-2009 at 00:11
|
|
Sep-10-2009 23:53
|
|
|
 |
 |
The17sss
C.R.E.A.M.

Registered: May 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Clovis
No that is not what is happening.
52% of Americans oppose the healthcare plan because the GOP has misled a sizable chunk of the country into thinking that increasing and reforming access to healthcare in this country is worse than rape.
Of that 52% I'll bet less than half have legitimate, reasonable and well educated concerns with the plan (which I acknowledge there are). The rest have been scared into submission to the idea that we will become a communist country overnight, bureaucrats are going to pull the plug on grandma, illegal aliens will be given another free ride, and free markets will be thing of the past (even though they already are).
Next stop...gulags |
That's some pretty hardcore conspiracy thinking. What has happened is that pieces of the bill have come to light, and the alternative to the mainstream media are showing people some facts that they were not aware of. Sure there is some disinformation out there... ON BOTH SIDES. But for the most part, people are smart enough to figure things out for themselves when given the time to have over 1000 pages explored. You seem to just want to let anything Obama wants pass right through with no debate, as quickly as possible. Democrats weren't even reading the bill by their own admission! That's not how it should work before voting on massive legislation.
Let me ask you this: if our healthcare system is so broken, and private insurance is so bad, why is he telling people if they like it, they can keep it?
And, what was the rush to jam it through in 2 weeks when he first tried? It isn't supposed to go into effect until March 2013... right after the 2012 presidential election. That's fucking fishy as hell dude. If we're really on the brink of catastrophe with the healthcare system, why not enact it ASAP once it passes?
|
|
Sep-11-2009 00:03
|
|
|
 |
 |
Capitalizt
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: USA
|
|
|
I for one am shocked they haven't passed some form of universal healthcare yet. Why is Obama f*cking around? He should have done this his first month in office. With overwhelming approval and a huge majority in both houses, he could have had it.. Now we've had all these scandals and doubts spreading across the country, the opposition has been mobilized, we've discovered that the debt will be $2 trillion more than Obama anticipated, and now this news about Acorn throwing further doubt on the wisdom of people in government (who were throwing hundreds of millions at them in stimulus payments, etc.) It's frakking doomed now. Too bad lefties. You had your shot at a real socialist dream for a few months there..the goal you've been aiming at with incremental steps since FDR and you blew it.
Last edited by Capitalizt on Sep-11-2009 at 00:48
|
|
Sep-11-2009 00:36
|
|
|
 |
 |
Capitalizt
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: USA
|
|
|
No, that's my point lez...Why did he even bother trying to compromise? He had a strong mandate in January and it has been slowly slipping away ever since. What did he accomplish with it? Maybe one thing...cap and trade, big frakking deal. It should have been a "liberal" bill from the start.
|
|
Sep-11-2009 00:40
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:15.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|