Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > NASA to Bomb the Moon? (LIVE)
Pages (5): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
Halcyon+On+On
Liebchen



Registered: Sep 2004
Location: midcoast

quote:
Originally posted by culorut
I am positive some are doing it for the laughs



___________________
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

Old Post Oct-08-2009 02:12 
Click Here to See the Profile for Halcyon+On+On Click here to Send Halcyon+On+On a Private Message Add Halcyon+On+On to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
ziptnf
Programming your future



Registered: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY

I like how this thread turned out


___________________

Set Archive | TA DJ Challenge

Old Post Oct-08-2009 11:56 
Click Here to See the Profile for ziptnf Click here to Send ziptnf a Private Message Visit ziptnf's homepage! Add ziptnf to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
colonelcrisp
Isn't Batshit Crazy



Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Ottawa

im going to pipe in just for a second.....


technically NASA isn't bombing anything.... the probe cannot be classified as a bomb as it does not contain an explosive payload.... its a projectile.


the most important question you should be asking yourself is why the fuck anyone should give a shit about this? hitting the moon with a satellite is comparable to farting in a hurricane, no one will ever notice.....


then to back up your theory of this being an evil act you quote a crack pot who thinks this is a space based weapons test? hate to break it to you, but if this was a weapons test, this is the worst weapon ever conceived..... any enemy that cant see a fucking satellite heading for them on a crash course deserves to be wiped out........


___________________
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
I have 3 hobbies: gaming, DJing & correcting maladjusted fools on the internet.

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
Yeah, I’d like to know what horrible, scarring incident in your childhood turned you into such an ignorant, intellectual-hating philistine?

Old Post Oct-08-2009 13:43  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for colonelcrisp Click here to Send colonelcrisp a Private Message Add colonelcrisp to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Krypton
83.798 g/6.022x10^23



Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Texas

As soon as colorot appears he's gone. Until the next youtube-outed conspiracy!!!


___________________

Old Post Oct-08-2009 18:24  Korea-Democratic Peoples Republic
Click Here to See the Profile for Krypton Click here to Send Krypton a Private Message Visit Krypton's homepage! Add Krypton to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
occrider
Traveladdict



Registered: Oct 2000
Location: New York

NASA went ahead and bombed the moon and I haven't been able to see it all morning. It looks like it's gone folks. RIP moon, I'll miss you


___________________
Retro ...

Old Post Oct-09-2009 14:26  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for occrider Click here to Send occrider a Private Message Add occrider to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
culorut
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jan 2007
Location: right here

No big flash from NASA’s moon crash


A pair of NASA spacecraft smashed into the moon at twice the speed of a bullet, as part of a mission aimed at blasting up signs of water ice.

Pictures of the impact zone were beamed back live to Earth, but the video imagery did not show any signs of a flash.

"It's hard to tell what we saw there," said Michael Bicay, director of science at NASA's Ames Research Center in California.

The first crash took place at 7:31 a.m. ET. That’s when an empty rocket that weighed 2.2 tons hit the crater Cabeus. It was expected to create a crater about 66 feet (20 meters) wide, which is half the length of an Olympic pool. The blast should have kicked up a plume of lunar debris about six miles (10 kilometers) high.

Scientists hoped an analysis of the debris would confirm the theory that water — a key resource if people are going to go back to the moon — is hidden below the barren moonscape.

Trailing behind the rocket was the lunar probe LCROSS, short for Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite and pronounced L-Cross. For four minutes, the LCROSS shepherding spacecraft sent Earth live pictures of the rocket stage's expected impact zone in multiple wavelengths — and then plunged into the crater itself.

Telescopes around the world — including the orbiting Hubble Space Telescope — aimed their cameras at the moon to capture views of the dust-up.

At least one telescope team, at the MMT Observatory in Arizona, reported spotting a bright debris plume. The visible-light images sent back by LCROSS itself showed no sign of such a plume, although Bicay noted that evidence of a crash did turn up in thermal imagery.

LCROSS project manager Dan Andrews said it was possible that the lighting was bad for the spacecraft's images, and that those images needed to be tweaked to make the debris plume easier to see. The raw images could have been essentially “gray against black,” he said.

“What matters for us is: What is the nature of the stuff that was kicked up going in?” Andrews said. “All nine instruments were working fine and we received good data.”

The data will be analyzed for weeks to come. If the analysis shows no signs of water, that would run counter to recent findings suggesting that lunar soil, also known as regolith, contains more water ice than previously thought.

However, Bicay said there could be other explanations for the absence of a water signal. For example, it may be that the water is unevenly distributed — even within the permanently shadowed polar craters that are thought to be the best prospects for ice mining. Bicay said LCROSS' scientists may have come across a situation familiar to Texas oil wildcatters.

"We may have hit a dry hole rather than a wet hole," he said.

Mission ends after mere months
Launched in LCROSS and its bigger rocket stage launched together last June and only separated Thursday night, the last major milestone before the big crash.

The lunar demolition derby was broadcast live on NASA Television and on the Internet. NASA reported that as many as 391,000 Internet users were watching the webcast concurrently. That made it the space agency's third biggest Web video event, behind the space shuttle Discovery's launch and landing in 2005.

Click for related content
Three probes confirm water’s presence on moon
Orbiter sees tentative signs of water on moon
Save the moon? Experts try to ease fears

Museums and observatories across the country hosted early-morning LCROSS gatherings, but in most cases, the events didn't live up to advance expectations. At Los Angeles' Griffith Observatory, people who got up early to look for the crash threw confused looks at each other instead.

Telescope demonstrator Jim Mahon called the celestial show "anticlimactic.”

“I was hoping we’d see a flash or a flare,” he said.

The LCROSS probe cost $79 million and was an add-on to a bigger NASA satellite, known as Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, which is now circling the moon.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3322660..._science-space/

Old Post Oct-09-2009 14:41  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for culorut Click here to Send culorut a Private Message Add culorut to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
ziptnf
Programming your future



Registered: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY

What a waste of fucking time/money. What is the point of finding water on the moon? Who cares?


___________________

Set Archive | TA DJ Challenge

Old Post Oct-09-2009 14:48 
Click Here to See the Profile for ziptnf Click here to Send ziptnf a Private Message Visit ziptnf's homepage! Add ziptnf to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Capitalizt
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2005
Location: USA

quote:
Originally posted by ziptnf
What a waste of fucking time/money. What is the point of finding water on the moon? Who cares?


Well there are many scientific benefits if we decide to colonize the moon in the next 50 years..but aside from that I think it would be worth it alone to deliver another blow to creationist wackos. If God is all-knowing, all-powerful, and made everything perfectly without any waste or unnecessary extras, why the frak did he make underground oceans on a barren rock floating in the sky? Why did the moon need water if he didn't put life there?

Anything to progress human knowledge and make religion look a bit more stupid is worth a few million in my book.

Old Post Oct-09-2009 15:00  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Capitalizt Click here to Send Capitalizt a Private Message Add Capitalizt to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Sunsnail
Global Moderator



Registered: Sep 2004
Location:

Personally I just kinda wanna know. We're blowing trillions of dollars on all this shit, why not crash into the moon and see if there's water. It all makes sense in this world

Old Post Oct-09-2009 15:13 
Click Here to See the Profile for Sunsnail Click here to Send Sunsnail a Private Message Add Sunsnail to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Capitalizt
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2005
Location: USA

quote:
Originally posted by Sunsnail
We're blowing trillions of dollars on all this shit, why not crash into the moon and see if there's water.


That's the spirit!

Old Post Oct-09-2009 15:31  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Capitalizt Click here to Send Capitalizt a Private Message Add Capitalizt to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Krypton
83.798 g/6.022x10^23



Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Texas

If there is water on the moon, that means whatever moon base we have in the future will be able to make its own water from that on the moon.


___________________

Old Post Oct-09-2009 18:28  Korea-Democratic Peoples Republic
Click Here to See the Profile for Krypton Click here to Send Krypton a Private Message Visit Krypton's homepage! Add Krypton to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
culorut
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jan 2007
Location: right here

quote:
Originally posted by Krypton
If there is water on the moon, that means whatever moon base we have in the future will be able to make its own water from that on the moon.



Old Post Oct-09-2009 19:29  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for culorut Click here to Send culorut a Private Message Add culorut to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > NASA to Bomb the Moon? (LIVE)
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (5): « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackTech tune [2003] [1]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackINFERNAL - SUNRISE [2002]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:24.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!