|
| quote: | Originally posted by Omega_Blue
I'm on my phone so I can't quote you two, but yeah sure, I agree; we would have to play sometime because I'm by no means a by-the-book player, I'm just saying that as slim of the odds he had of winning, his pot odds and implied odds did not warrant a call post-flop. At best he's getting a little more than 1-to-1 odds on his money, which imo isn't worth the call for a %16 chance of winning at showdown.
Like I said before though, that's not saying I wouldn't have called, the postflop bet was almost too cheap not to call (about a sixth of his stack, if I'm doing the math right?) so I would've called hoping to catch a miracle but expecting to fold. If I totally missed I wouldn't feel comfortable bluffing on the turn the way the hand had played out and I have doubts that dwan would've done so (had he missed).
Now that you mention it, I failed to assess the fact that he raised the original bettor so I understand now why he felt he could play his position and his implied hand strength.. again, though, after the turn he pretty much had a made hand, so the only tough decision making he had to do was what action to perform post-flop. And I'm still gonna contend that after the turn he just got lucky, and his opponent just played badly.
Edit: rod you seem to be focusing on the players habits and dispositions which I can't speculate on because I have no idea how either of them play and have only one hand to judge their behaviors on. All good points though. |
This calls for a match! I will arraign the table, you two arraign a flight and hotel. We will play til the death...or the loss of $40, whichever is first.
|