|
It's an idiotic thing to argue about. Both have their own sets of major flaws, and neither is really "better" than the other anymore. Just different.
To the guy asking about OSX and multi-processor machines:
I'd wait a while before dumping money into a 12 core machine. I have an 8-core 2.8GHz "early 2008" model, and I rarely notice much difference between it and my Macbook Pro for common tasks. I haven't upgraded to Logic 9 yet, so I can't comment on the new update that I think I heard was supposed to improve Logic's utilization of multiple processors.
The only time I really see the processing power being taken advantage of, is when I'm running VMWare ESXi... which kind of defeats the purpose of buying a 12-core Apple machine instead of something better suited to that task. I'm fine with it, since I actually do have a use for that capability, but for most users buying Apple machines, it's obviously not really a selling point.
I'd also avoid making yourself an early adopter of anything with the Apple name on it, based on my own experiences over the past 10 years or so. This has only become worse since Apple started experiencing the exponential growth of it's user and product base again.
|