|
| quote: | Originally posted by Brian Scott
if you read the bill the woody posted on the 2nd page of this thread, you will find that congresswoman ma's re-election event falls squarely within the rules. this is a private event held at a private venue. sorry all, but this will not be sufficient ammo against the proposed bill.
this bill really only affects the major festivals that are held on public property, ie the sports arena. undergrounds and clubs will not be affected. |
You have to think like a lawyer does and which every lawyer in the State of California will do if this measure passes. Clearly you can use her party as ammo. Example define "private" vs "public"? According to her party page she has three prices. General Admission, VIP w/o bottle service, VIP w/ bottle service. If you're charging me a $100 for entry to a banquet hall for Ma's NYE Party, and then I go and pay admission to see Carl Cox perform at The Coliseum, what's the difference? Both events have alcohol, party favors, and whatever else. It's double talk. Plan and simple. A private event if that's what Ma wants to call her party, then why is advertised? It would be by invitation only. Same as if you were to label it a wedding.
Lets see what more propaganda she says. Just because I hate politicians.
"Raves foster an environment that threatens the health and safety of our youth," said Assemblywoman Ma.
Ok, so you just described everyday life as we know it.
"The bill is not intended to impact traditional music concerts and sporting events.
So, when the Lakers win Championships, it's ok to riot in the streets, and burn out cars and vandalize buildings. Traditional concerts. Hmmm I saw more drug use at the Rush concert then I did at EDC.
Attendance at raves can range from 16,000 to 185,000 people, which is simply unmanageable. "Raves are a state-wide problem and require a state-wide approach," said Assemblywoman Ma.
Hmmm, maybe if you didn't layoff all those police, fire and medical personnel you might have a handle on it. Instead of wasting our tax money on useless bills, you could put that money into training. Oh I forgot you're a DEMOCRAP. You also state in your public statement that you "MA", have no desire to create new jobs, and you're admitting that once again big government has failed. After all, how does a minor get into an 18+ event? Hmmmm.....
The bill was introduced after recent raves in Los Angeles and Daly City led to deaths, overdoses, and hundreds of arrests. Raves in California are notoriously associated with the use of the drug commonly known as Ecstasy.
How long have music festivals or what she deems as "raves" been going on? And how many deaths within the last twenty years? You have better odds dying from a car accident. Have you not seen how Californians drive? Once again, show me a concert that doesn't have drug use? What do you think they did at Woodstock? Sip tea?
Clearly this woman has really nothing going for her other than contradictions. All this will do is promote lawsuits from every angle and it goes against the 1st and 2nd Ammendments. Last time I checked California is on the verge on bankruptcy. Lawyers don't accept IOU's.
|