|
I think the problem that I have with threads like this one (albeit a little less than the other one I C&P'd my feigned agreement with), is that they're so murky to begin with. They always present with staunch sentimentality for the fading way things used to be. They find fault with the status quo while failing regard for the fact that all musical styles exist within their own continuum. In that regard, they have a cause for propping up that which is perceived to be sagging - and not in a very productive way.
What I've noticed about this forum is that the most successful threads are consistently non-reductive in their analysis of music, unless by incidental comparison. The OP usually asks for something specifically related to music they're interested in discussing and if people can relate to it, then the thread is relatively successful.
The worst threads are purely reductive criticisms (Shaw's Worst DJ thread being an exception that proves the rule) and those which promote artists converging on or already in the mainstream (Above & Beyond, Armin Van Buuren, Tiesto, Swedish House Mafia, Deadmau5). Threads which are started to slam Deadmau5 (who I actually like), dubstep (and even citing legitimately crappy music e.g. Brostep), minimal - even when there's wide agreement - don't really serve any purpose and usually descend into meaninglessness, anyways.
Personally, I think these "cause" threads are one step above the reductive critique threads and are inherently reductive in themselves since, more often than not, they seem to focus on what isn't to someone's liking, which pretty much maps out the thread's future to be that which continually focuses on a deficit. Maybe Trance Energy has earned remembrance but attempting to leverage some collective negotiation to help maintain the same format it's had since its inception, seems a little short-sighted.
It isn't really pointing to anyone who's being innovative in music. It's not concerned with stylistic elements. It doesn't even focus on musicians, producers, DJ's and/or promoters who actually might be continuing where TE left off. It's just trying to insist that nothing good will come from TE's change and that it should therefor stay the same as it used to be. I'm neither for or against that. It's just with such a focus, I don't think it's necessarily wrong to take issue with it and I'm also not really certain how it qualifies as a topic for Music Discussion, to begin with.
___________________

Now with extra singles!
my old stuff, not quite up to snuff - but I still dig it - UPDATED 9/23/2012
|