lol it was hilarious. thats what she gets for carrying water bottle and polluting our earth
Sep-02-2011 18:14
justin
bana na-na
Registered: Jan 2001
Location: home
maybe she'll quit
Sep-03-2011 01:53
Chris Crossland
Duke Silver
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London
quote:
Originally posted by meriter
that guy's hair is an even greater mystery than machu picchu
___________________
Figure out what to do, then take a nap.
Sep-03-2011 01:57
Ted Promo
NWO WOLFPACK INSANE
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Can this be my goal??!
What is wrong about her hurting? Hm?
Sep-03-2011 02:26
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion
Registered: Jul 2002
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by EddieZilker
Its validity as a socially respectable art-form -OR- that it's not a symptom of your scathing insecurity relating to a laundry list of possible inadequacies.
Take your pick, er, well... both, really.
what if i just find prick acts to randoms amusing? why is the target of the prick act specifically relevant? it would've been just as good (possibly better) had they picked on grandma or someone in a wheelchair.
___________________
Sep-03-2011 02:45
justin
bana na-na
Registered: Jan 2001
Location: home
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
Is the OP a dickhead or something?
KPS
Sep-03-2011 03:22
wizniz
operator
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: terror wagon
quote:
Originally posted by Vivid Boy
lol it was hilarious. thats what she gets for carrying water bottle and polluting our earth
fuck pollution. lolz ironic.
___________________
www.illysounds.com
Sep-03-2011 04:57
EddieZilker
This is the dance.
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Marijuana Sex Camp
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
what if i just find prick acts to randoms amusing? why is the target of the prick act specifically relevant? it would've been just as good (possibly better) had they picked on grandma or someone in a wheelchair.
You're proposing that, by reducing or removing the sexual component of the equation and replacing it with any unknown variable less than anyone-capable-of-fighting-back, your enjoyment doesn't equate to the reflection of a psychological need satisfied by your proposed model of simple (not sexual) sadism.
If it was a fat kid, PKC would still laugh out of his "prickness".
Sep-03-2011 19:42
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion
Registered: Jul 2002
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by EddieZilker
You're proposing that, by reducing or removing the sexual component of the equation and replacing it with any unknown variable less than anyone-capable-of-fighting-back, your enjoyment doesn't equate to the reflection of a psychological need satisfied by your proposed model of simple (not sexual) sadism.
False.
that's exactly what im saying (though im not sure you've written it correctly- should that be "your enjoyment is equated"??). the specific nature of the target of the act played no part in my enjoyment, though as i already mentioned, even more helpless targets may have increased that enjoyment. also had they managed to throw some racism in, that too may have increased my enjoyment.
i honestly didn't notice a sexual component in the equation (other than the chick appeared attractive). it certainly did not increase or decrease the humour i found in the act, because her attractiveness (or not) was not relevant to me.
___________________
Sep-04-2011 02:09
Halcyon+On+On
Liebchen
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: midcoast
It's not truly sadism if there isn't a sexual component.
___________________
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Sep-04-2011 02:29
Fledz
Banned
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: London UK
I read the thread first, then watched the video. Seriously, that's it? Fuck, talk about "white people problems"