|
Ridiculous and whiny list. Comparing multi-million selling acts with other multi-million acts.
Might as well chuck my own opinions in as well.
About the Beatles: They were innovative, also one of the first widely-known acts to use electronic instruments IIRC. Great songwriters as well as the voice of a generation.
Elvis: Impressive voice, but most of his popularity comes from being a white man making black people's music (R&R).
Queen: Ah, Mercury and the band. No respect really, a lot of their music is terribly annoying and a repetition of the same theme. Probably more fun if your heart is covered in union jacks.
REM: No clue what's so special about them, pretty bland and non-provocative pulp.
Jimmy Hendrix: Unparalleled mastery of the guitar and an inspiring legacy to boot.
Nirvana: Grunty deppresive provocative youth act spawning an army of copycats. whoo and yay.
Bruce Springsteen: Now we're getting to an older generations' own cheesekings.
Pearl Jam: Why is this considered classic greatness while creed, who basically do the exact same thing, are part of the depressive new kid flock?
Bob Marly: Respect màn and all. But i like eek-a-mouse more for cliché stoning purpouses 
___________________
Mixes: Alaé (Conceptional ambient dub)
AOTSE (Experimental)
Listens:
http://www.last.fm/user/bierheld
Last edited by Bierheld on Dec-06-2011 at 16:28
|