quote:

Originally posted by 0100306660SAS oh right !!! cause a society which offers the 'health' industry that is built towards profits and revenue would surely make studies that prove that a plant (that everyone can grow in their backyard) which has numerous health benefits readily available. when you make money off of sick people, it is in your best interest to have more sick people. a plant that cures many diseases, that everyone can grow themselves, would be detrimental to their profits. money rules the world. you are a slave to it. and you are brainwashed into a conformity which is more ore less ignorant and paranoid. you need to seriously reconsider your intelligence, and start from step one. you are stupid. learn to think.

Sure.

But you have the study that shows it does so why all the subterfuge. Just share it. Why hide such a wonderful finding. I thought that was what the evil corporations do.

I don't understand what would motivate you to not share this study you claim to have that states what you stated earlier. Did you forget ? I understand how simple tasks can be hard for the dim witted so maybe just go at your own pace. I'm sure you will find it.

___________________
"This is why Superman works alone." GC
old stuff from days gone by (2001-2004)
Mad For Brad's gay little contest

quote:

Originally posted by Looney4Clooney Sure. But you have the study that shows it does so why all the subterfuge. Just share it. Why hide such a wonderful finding. I thought that was what the evil corporations do. I don't understand what would motivate you to not share this study you claim to have that states what you stated earlier. Did you forget ? I understand how simple tasks can be hard for the dim witted so maybe just go at your own pace. I'm sure you will find it.

if you trusted nature, and you stopped your ignorance towards understanding nature...

you would be more fit to find useful information such as the things i have mentioned.

i can only point you in the right direction. you will have to do the work yourself.

I just want to learn. You claim to have the study. You have an issue with my ignorance. So lets solve this. SHow me the study. i learn. We all win.

Why hide such a marvellous finding. You go on about the corporations and how they don't give these studies the time of day. You are pretty much doing that. You are doing what you jsut stated you hate.

I can just forget about it if you are tired of well, i can see how you might want to save face. I respect your ability to reach impressive cognitive lows and still put up a fight. Like Rocky. You take a beating and you are consistent in being fucking retarded and i respect that .

___________________
"This is why Superman works alone." GC
old stuff from days gone by (2001-2004)
Mad For Brad's gay little contest

Last edited by Looney4Clooney on Feb-11-2015 at 06:02

quote:

Originally posted by Looney4Clooney I just want to learn. You claim to have the study. You have an issue with my ignorance. So lets solve this. SHow me the study. i learn. We all win. Why hide such a marvellous finding.

Medical Marijuana (Cannabinoids)
Basically there is not much in the way of help to be had. Medical marijuana may be the only logical alternative treatment for symptoms.


www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVXqo7Dn5H0


www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4f8EbTQwRc


Testimonials
Jeffrey Hergenrather, MD " In my opinion, there is no better drug for the treatment of anxiety disorders, brain trauma and post concussion syndrome."


"Marijuana is the only thing that helps me, physically and mentally as I started using almost on a daily basis now early this summer ....I've used on occasion through out highschool but a few times a year....I truly believe it has helped save my life and/or get my life back together and am starting to enjoy life again, as I was severly depressed given my life was gone at 20 years old. It takes my nausea away, makes me relax and stop dwelling on my symptoms and future."


"Cannabis has been shown to reactivate brain cells as well as regenerate new growth."

Recommendation: Whole plant extract (Indica x Sativa hybrid), tincture, edibles, vaporize, spray.



References__________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________

. Thatcher, R.W., EEG operant conditioning (biofeedback) and traumatic brain injury. Clin Electroencephalography, 2000. 31(1): p. 38-44.
2. Hugenholtz, H., et al., How long does it take to recover from a mild concussion? Neurosurgery, 1988. 22(5): p. 853-8.
3. Slagle, D.A., Psychiatric disorders following closed head injury: an overview of biopsychosocial factors in their etiology and management. Int J Psychiatry Med, 1990. 20(1): p. 1-35.
4. Fenton, G.W., The postconcussional syndrome reappraised. Clin Electroencephalogr, 1996. 27(4): p. 174-82.
5. Ponsford, J. and G. Kinsella, Attentional deficits following closed-head injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 1992. 14(5): p. 822-38.
6. Ponsford, J., S. Sloan, and P. Snow, Traumatic Brain Injury: Rehabilitation for everyday adaptive living. 1995, Hillsdale (USA): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Zwil, A.S., M.E. Sandel, and E. Kim, Organic and psychological sequelae of traumatic brain injury: the postconcussional syndrome in clinical practice. New Dir Ment Health Serv, 1993(57): p. 109-15.
8. Stevens, M.M., Post concussion syndrome. J Neurosurg Nurs, 1982. 14(5): p. 239-44.
9. Elkind, A.H., Headache and facial pain associated with head injury. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 1989. 22(6): p. 1251-71.
10. Fann, J.R., et al., Psychiatric disorders and functional disability in outpatients with traumatic brain injuries. Am J Psychiatry, 1995. 152(10): p. 1493-9.
11. Munoz-Cespedes, J.M., et al., [The nature, diagnosis and treatment of post-concussion syndrome]. Rev Neurol, 1998. 27(159): p. 844-53.
12. Pelczar, M. and B. Politynska, [Pathogenesis and psychosocial consequences of post-concussion syndrome]. Neurol Neurochir Pol, 1997. 31(5): p. 989-98.
13. Harrington, D.E., et al., Current perceptions of rehabilitation professionals towards mild traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1993. 74(6): p. 579-86.
14. Binder, L.M., Persisting symptoms after mild head injury: a review of the postconcussive syndrome. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 1986. 8(4): p. 323-46.
15. Hilton, G., Behavioral and cognitive sequelae of head trauma. Orthop Nurs, 1994. 13(4): p. 25-32.
16. Hillier, S.L., M.H. Sharpe, and J. Metzer, Outcomes 5 years post-traumatic brain injury (with further reference to neurophysical impairment and disability). Brain Inj, 1997. 11(9): p. 661-75.
17. Millis, S.R., et al., Long-term neuropsychological outcome after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 2001. 16(4): p. 343-55.
18. Hillier, S.L. and J. Metzer, Awareness and perceptions of outcomes after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj, 1997. 11(7): p. 525-36.
19. Johansson, E., M. Ronnkvist, and A.R. Fugl-Meyer, Traumatic brain injury in northern Sweden. Incidence and prevalence of long-standing impairments and disabilities. Scand J Rehabil Med, 1991. 23(4): p. 179-85.
20. Malia, K., G. Powell, and S. Torode, Personality and psychosocial function after brain injury. Brain Inj, 1995. 9(7): p. 697-712.
21. Max, J.E., B.A. Robertson, and A.E. Lansing, The phenomenology of personality change due to traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, 2001. 13(2): p. 161-70.
22. Gerring, J., et al., Neuroimaging variables related to development of Secondary Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder after closed head injury in children and adolescents. Brain Inj, 2000. 14(3): p. 205-18.
23. Voller, B., et al., Neuropsychological, MRI and EEG findings after very mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj, 1999. 13(10): p. 821-7.
24. Jansen, H.M., et al., Cobalt-55 positron emission tomography in traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1996. 60(2): p. 221-4.
25. Rudolf, J., et al., Cerebral glucose metabolism in acute and persistent vegetative state. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 1999. 11(1): p. 17-24.
26. Bergsneider, M., et al., Cerebral hyperglycolysis following severe traumatic brain injury in humans: a positron emission tomography study. J Neurosurg, 1997. 86(2): p. 241-51.
27. Matz, P.G. and L. Pitts, Monitoring in traumatic brain injury. Clin Neurosurg, 1997. 44: p. 267-94.
28. Thatcher, R.W., et al., Biophysical Linkage between MRI and EEG Amplitude in Closed Head Injury. Neuroimage, 1998. 7(4): p. 352-367.
29. Thatcher, R.W., et al., Biophysical linkage between MRI and EEG coherence in closed head injury. Neuroimage, 1998. 8(4): p. 307-26.
30. Thatcher, R.W., et al., Quantitative MRI of the gray-white matter distribution in traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 1997. 14(1): p. 1-14.
31. Shaw, N.A., The neurophysiology of concussion. Prog Neurobiol, 2002. 67(4): p. 281-344.
32. Montgomery, E.A., et al., The psychobiology of minor head injury. Psychol Med, 1991. 21(2): p. 375-84.
33. Duff, J., The usefulness of Quantitative EEG (QEEG) and Neurotherapy in the Assessment, and Treatment of Post-Concussion Syndrome. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 2004. 35(4): p. 1-12.
34. Hughes, J.R. and E.R. John, Conventional and quantitative electroencephalography in psychiatry. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 1999. 11(2): p. 190-208.
35. Thatcher, R.W., et al., EEG discriminant analyses of mild head trauma. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1989. 73(2): p. 94-106.
36. Thatcher, R.W., et al., QEEG and traumatic brain injury: rebuttal of the American Academy of Neurology 1997 report by the EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society. Clin Electroencephalogr, 1999. 30(3): p. 94-8.
37. Gordon, E., Integrative neuroscience in psychiatry: the role of a standardized database. Australasian Psychiatry, 2003. 11(2): p. 156-163.
38. Lubar, J.F., Discourse on the development of EEG diagnostics and biofeedback for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders. Biofeedback and Self Regulation, 1991. 16(3): p. 201-225.
39. Sterman, M.B., Sensorimotor EEG operant conditioning: Experimental and clinical effects. Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 1977. 12(2): p. 63-92.
40. Sterman, M.B., EEG biofeedback: physiological behavior modification. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 1981. 5(3): p. 405-12.
41. Thompson, L. and M. Thompson, Neurofeedback combined with training in metacognitive strategies: Effectiveness in students with ADD. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 1998. 23(4): p. 243-263.
42. Thatcher, R.W., Normative EEG databases and EEG biofeedback. Journal of Neurotherapy, 1998. 2(4): p. 8-39.
43. Thatcher, R.W., EEG database guided neurotherapy, in Introduction to Quantitative EEG and Neurofeedback, A. Abarbanel, Editor. 1999, Academic Press: San Diego.
44. Sterman, M.B., Physiological origins and functional correlates of EEG rhythmic activities: Implications for self-regulation. Biofeedback and Self Regulation, 1996. 21(1): p. 3-33.

Harvard Psychiatrist Says Weed Heals Concussions

http://fusion.net/video/2778/harvar...ls-concussions/

you don't seem to understand what a study is. You posted an anecdote. References are used to validate claims that aren't substantiated with data in the study. So you really have one person saying their opinion with no double blind testing.

Its ok man. I still think you are brave and your dementia is just another layer of that beautiful onion.

___________________
"This is why Superman works alone." GC
old stuff from days gone by (2001-2004)
Mad For Brad's gay little contest

quote:

Originally posted by 0100306660SAS Harvard Psychiatrist Says Weed Heals Concussions http://fusion.net/video/2778/harvar...ls-concussions/

"
The extensive research required to definitively determine cannabis’s ability to prevent CTE will require millions of dollars in upfront investment,” Dr. Lester Grinspoon wrote in an open letter to Goodell, via LeafScience.com"

that is what you call a hunch. Not a study. Not proof. A gut feeling. He disagrees with you.
HE has no evidence. He has no data to support any claim other than it might be possible. That is a hypothesis.

___________________
"This is why Superman works alone." GC
old stuff from days gone by (2001-2004)
Mad For Brad's gay little contest

quote:

Originally posted by Looney4Clooney " The extensive research required to definitively determine cannabis’s ability to prevent CTE will require millions of dollars in upfront investment,” Dr. Lester Grinspoon wrote in an open letter to Goodell, via LeafScience.com" that is what you call a hunch. Not a study. Not proof. A gut feeling. He disagrees with you. HE has no evidence. He has no data to support any claim other than it might be possible. That is a hypothesis.

when there is thousands of people with concussions posting on various forums saying

"it helped me"

you have to be seriously mentally ill to not view that as evidence.

quote:

Originally posted by Looney4Clooney you don't seem to understand what a study is. You posted an anecdote. References are used to validate claims that aren't substantiated with data in the study. So you really have one person saying their opinion with no double blind testing. Its ok man. I still think you are brave and your dementia is just another layer of that beautiful onion.

you seem to think that scientific studies are an authority on reality.

you are an idiot.

you know how many studies get faked every year?

I would say they are better than one person saying, hey this might work. I find your primitive outlook exotic and refreshing and a reminder of simpler times and i respect you for that .

___________________
"This is why Superman works alone." GC
old stuff from days gone by (2001-2004)
Mad For Brad's gay little contest

quote:

Originally posted by Looney4Clooney I would say they are better than one person saying, hey this might work. I find your primitive outlook exotic and refreshing and a reminder of simpler times and i respect you for that .

hockey players realize that weed helps with concussion symptoms when they smoke it recreationally.

and they are supposed to be "jocks" with brain damage.

and even theyve figured it out.

your scientists need to play more sports,

and experience life a little more before they can claim that their butchering of empiricism is actually valid.

life is happening. in the real world.

not in some industrial lab that contorts and corrupts studies based on funding.

if you report the thing which the funding committe do not want you to, you lose your job.

oh yeah "science"

where money dictates conformity and propaganda.