Originally posted by occrider
Cyrus ... nothing has even HAPPENED yet to arrive at the conclusion that the US will do anything militarily with Iran. Don't you think you're being a tad bit extremist??? I personally resent the remark that you're in disgust with my government about this when there is no THIS. People so far have been merely quoting CNN and using that as a basis in determining what the US foreign policy is before that policy is even established much less made clear to the public!!! If this isn't an example of prejudiced preconceptions I don't know what is. It's not like I go around saying that Arafat will reject ANY peace treaty Israel proposes because everything has failed in the past.
"Iran now openly says it is pursuing a complete nuclear fuel cycle. We completely reject Iran's claim that it is doing so for peaceful purposes," White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said.
___________________
"This place isn't big enough for me to blow it up."
-MARCO V
Mar-12-2003 07:31
occrider
Traveladdict
Registered: Oct 2000
Location: New York
quote:
Originally posted by Cyrus King
"Iran now openly says it is pursuing a complete nuclear fuel cycle. We completely reject Iran's claim that it is doing so for peaceful purposes," White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said.
You still haven't come to the proper conclusion as to what will happen ... again you're quoting cnn and insinuating that the US will do so and so with what not. PROVE to me that the US will attack Iran with miliatary force. Don't give me some bullshit answer that it's within our "nature" or some crap like that, give me some kind of logical proof that supports the claim you're making. You people need to chill out ... TIME will tell, not preconceptions.
Mar-12-2003 07:46
Romp
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Mar 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
quote:
PROVE to me that the US will attack Iran with miliatary force
How can you prove something which will occur in the future
Mar-12-2003 09:48
occrider
Traveladdict
Registered: Oct 2000
Location: New York
quote:
Originally posted by Romp
How can you prove something which will occur in the future
My point exactly. People are taking CNN reports about Iran's nuclear reactor and are jumping to the conclusion that the US is obviously going to invade ...
Mar-12-2003 14:59
bouzo
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Montreal, Canada
quote:
Originally posted by occrider
My point exactly. People are taking CNN reports about Iran's nuclear reactor and are jumping to the conclusion that the US is obviously going to invade ...
well yeah i guess its not fair since the U.S is such a peacful just country ...like come on it really doesnt invade except if it really HAS to invade due to "NATIONAL SECURITY" reasons...nothing to do with oil bleeh who gives a fuck about the oil anywayz like as if afghanistan has oil or iraq has oil ...
___________________
blehhhhh
Mar-13-2003 20:08
occrider
Traveladdict
Registered: Oct 2000
Location: New York
quote:
Originally posted by bouzo
well yeah i guess its not fair since the U.S is such a peacful just country ...like come on it really doesnt invade except if it really HAS to invade due to "NATIONAL SECURITY" reasons...nothing to do with oil bleeh who gives a fuck about the oil anywayz like as if afghanistan has oil or iraq has oil ...
Afghanistan doesn't have oil
Mar-13-2003 20:48
TheDemon
Doggy Style Addict
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Dark Sector World!
quote:
Originally posted by Cyrus King
The US will definately try something.... its just the way they are..
And Iran is using it for energy purposes... even allowing inspectors to watch them in the process....
Atleast Iran is being smart about the whole issue. and letting the Inspectors have full view of what is going on means that their experiments with Uraninum is purely scientific.
___________________
Mar-14-2003 18:36
malek
drinks your milkshake!
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Montréal
Iran is next for sure. But it won't happen the same way as Iraq (military conflict). In Iran the youngsters are more in favor to the western ideals than the elders in power in that country.
It might come in a form of a coup or pressure with lots of popular support.
Syria is another question, it might involve military action.
Originally posted by ahlamalek
Iran is next for sure. But it won't happen the same way as Iraq (military conflict). In Iran the youngsters are more in favor to the western ideals than the elders in power in that country.
It might come in a form of a coup or pressure with lots of popular support.
Syria is another question, it might involve military action.
You are definately right on this one Ahlamalek. Iran was pro-western until those idiot fundementalist influenced the vulnerable public with their false promises. 70% of the population in Iran is under the age of 30. There will definately be a regime change this decade as the youth dont give a fuck about their religion, they want freedom and cant stand those people in power.
With respect to military intervention, i agree with you again. If the US were to attack militarily on Iran, the woorld will abrupt in chaos. Seeing that many hate the US goivernment there, it wouldnt go well with the 70 million people.
___________________
"This place isn't big enough for me to blow it up."
-MARCO V
Mar-31-2003 07:04
malek
drinks your milkshake!
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Montréal
Funny tho that the format of the govt in Iran was supported by the US against the Shaa...
Well the US seems to be on a blitz to corrects its old errors (read sarcasm)
