|
| quote: | Originally posted by sshyperion
I agree with the idea and reality that it's a paradox to have trance "mainstream" and "Underground". I think it's a cycle-based thing running over the years. One genre takes the scene, bloats and creates a mix of both good and arguably bad artists (remember there's no such thing as a definite bad artist; everyone's personal preferences in trance artists and any music artist will be different in a genre), then the genre deflates and goes into a more dormant and/or "original" state, with changes to it that can't be ignored, for better or worse. Anyways back to the original line of question and away from the personal attacks: should I have the fate of Trance in my hands, I'd make it more mainstream than it is currently, to a certain point.
Assuming that fate control could last for a while then I'd mainstream it for a few years then have it recess, giving the starting artists a taste for what happens out there when they become mainstream and hold their integrity in check accordingly and change accordingly. We can't always be bent on having trance styles stay a certain way 'cause music is not like that. It's about commonality but not absolute commonality; one can't see this until it goes mainstream and sees what happens.
I know it's a bit vague but I can write on for pages. Let Trance ascend mainstream status and we'll take it accordingly, then have it recede and go back to a starting point and see how it goes. |
Ok very good points from all of u guys!But this one i think deserves a reply ,i think
1)Evolution is the key to everything!But trance would never stop evoluting if most good producers didn't leave somehow the trance scene!That type of trance we are talking it was just discontinued!The trance that exists today is something totally different which created a big flow of such trance tracks is not an evolution its a revolution to me(to a worse state of trance)
2)Liking m.i.k.e instead of Taucher ,Solar Stone instead of insigma is different tastes within trance indeed! But liking Ian Van Dahl instead of Airwave ,Lasgo instead of the (old good) tiesto is a differenet thing!Things are getting away,here we are not talking about tastes we are talking about liking something completely different,so some things I believe must get a red line..
3)If u steer it to mainstream ,more and more 'non-relevant with the original trance'producers will enter the scene (due to the more "friendly" to the non-relevant people with original trance) hype it will have ,the perception to what is trance will change due to those producers basicly because of the new ppl those producers will bring to the so called "trance scene",some pure trance producers that still exist today will destroy theirselves to follow the "trend" other will stop other will go to other scenes and trance will transformed to just a name for a music with stupid pop melodies and "cool" electronica elements and things will get worse day by day and will have nothing relevant with what many of us here tend to name trance ...Of course other things will happen too some good some bad i am sure that u will analyse them back to me though I believe the loss of the good producers will harm trance to death
Peace
Last edited by feidias on Aug-19-2005 at 17:04
|