|
| quote: | Originally posted by The17sss
Haha... so the cited coalition names and sizes, cited congressional resoultions (and lack of), UN resolution names, UN Security Council vote tallies, dates of operation and address to nation, and cited concurrent military operations are all inaccurate lies? |
Indeed, becuase your premis is a complete fallacy.
Iraq was only about finding those WMD's? remember
oops, none found, so let's make it about regime change against a horrible dictator, that'll do it. Oh darn, that won't work because the UN resolution specifically didn't allow that.
Oh, but hold on, the UN resolution didn't actually allow any force for breach of the resolution so USA and Britain just stormed in there and as the recent inquiry in London found, it was a clear breach of international law.
Bugger, let's just glaze over all those pesky details by touting a congressional resolution (for what that's worth).
No? Ok let's mention some stuff about al-qaeda being in cahoots with Ghadaffi and maybe some of that mud will stick. lol.
Oh and as for the date thing, yeah, bush was quick to announce and make that address, nearly like he had it planned and everything well in advance. But of course no, it was just good timing on his part. You, know, because he was real good at that kind of thing.
C'mon now, even you can do better than this pile of junk.
|