 |
|
|
|
 |
staz
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: in front of a keyboard and a screen
|
|
|
Biggest danger of "Ecstasy" nowadays is getting pills that are adulterated with substances other than MDMA, which could prove very harmful and even lethal sometimes, especially if combined with other drugs. Since many manufacturers of the drugs don't give a shit about anything except their own wallets, the chances are unfortunately big that they'll mix whatever they can get their hands on in their pills, regardless of if two or more of the substances they put in a pill may interact dangerously with eachother when consumed.
For MDMA, the active chemical in "real ecstasy" the risks are relatively low in comparison to other things if the user is responsible and takes necessary precautions such as staying hydrated, take breaks from dancing (if dancing) and not overdoing it. Using the substance too often can result in terrible side effects though, but i'd dare saying taking breaks of 2-3 months between each session would keep a person relatively unexposed to most side effects.
There are testing kits to screen pills for MDMA, however, those kits can not tell if pills containing MDMA contain other substances (which might interact badly with MDMA - or increase body load to an excessive level) as well.
Risk Assessment
I also don't like to use the term ecstasy anymore, especially since when media reports a case of death, they use the term ecstasy without any regard to what actually was in the "ecstasy".. Just because ecstasy ment MDMA 20 years ago, doesn't mean it does today.. So to me it's really unclear how many of the (in that DEA table for example) of the Ecstasy emergency cases were actually caused by MDMA and not some other crappy shit stuffed into a pill for quick profit.
About the deaths btw, did anyone think of that if a substance wasn't illegal, it's purity could be controlled, people could dose correctly without risking OD'ing or getting something they don't want inside them, and criminal organisations benefitting from sales of a substance would no longer benefit from it.
[annoyed]terms like 'fucked' and 'pilling' shines from e-tardness, and imo they don't reflect any of what you'd want from a MDMA experience.. If you want to get 'fucked', just sniff some gasoline or glue, or bang your head into the wall a few times.. [/annoyed]
Last edited by staz on Oct-07-2003 at 21:18
|
|
Oct-07-2003 21:01
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
UWM
mandroid
Registered: Mar 2001
Location: Here
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by VaNFeCto
I understand what u guys are saying but the majority of users are idiots and do mix it with other drugs and its really killing the scene, |
I'm afraid that's a very common misconception. The majority of users inform themselves of the risks beforehand, and make sure to minimize any dangers. It is the FEW who are uninformed, ignorant, and just plain stupid that are ending up in the newspapers and making 'the scene' look so terrible.
|
|
Oct-07-2003 22:49
|
|
|
 |
 |
Pio
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: NYC-New Haven- San Juan-Amsterdam / PRTA #1
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by montie
everyone seems to say music is the drug and blah blah blah
but how come almost every amazing artist did drugs?
almost all the jazz greats did heroin and any other drug out there.
kurt cobain speaks for himself
elliot smith has heroin instead of blood running thru his vains
pink floyd and LSD
same with the beatles
and in the electronica scene. almost all the good producers do drugs.
sander kleinenberg breaths pot out of his lungs
sasha is a drug feind |
you can go back to aristotle, homer, da vinci, cervantes, michelangelo, mozart, virginia woolfe, van gogh, picasso, dali, stravinsky etc. etc. etc. regardless of the artform. all of them did something. sober minds are not as not as fucked up, and therefore not as creative. 
|
|
Oct-07-2003 23:02
|
|
|
 |
 |
montie
.

Registered: Aug 2002
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by YaleTrance
you can go back to aristotle, homer, da vinci, cervantes, michelangelo, mozart, virginia woolfe, van gogh, picasso, dali, stravinsky etc. etc. etc. regardless of the artform. all of them did something. sober minds are not as not as fucked up, and therefore not as creative. |
haha so true 
|
|
Oct-07-2003 23:04
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:43.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|