|
This is not a justification for use, but rather a counter to bad science.
Ecstacy has been in use for over 25 years recreationally, as has LSD and amphetamines.
We're simply not seeing the number of cases that the American studies predict. One study even predicted a mortality rate of 40% on first use.
You have to see these drugs in light of the amount of time they've been in use, and the real world, practical results of that. We don't see 40% of people that take a pill dying every weekend. Nor do we see people turning up to hospital in droves and being associate to prior drug use.
I agree that there's the POTENTIAL for damage from these drugs, and in fact, it's LIKELY to damage you if you binge, and PROVEN to damage you if you OD or it interracts badly with other medication you're taking.
I'd desperately love to see more research on the subject, because the more reliable, scientifically sound information there is, the better decisions can be made by individuals, communities and governments.
Relating all this back to raves... raves seem to have largely grown out of the commercialisation of the Hippy LSD culture.
We're seeing the results of that commercialisation now. Younger and younger people doing more and more stupid things because it's portraied as cool.
Does that make the scene itself bad, negative, inbred or dangerous? No, not really, but it DOES make the portrail of drugs as cool and hip dangerous.
Does having the scene built largely on and around drugs make it bad, negative or dangerous? No. There are many positive aspects to the scene, and many aspects of drug taking that are more neutral than anything else.
___________________
--
I'm running! I'm running! I'm running! ... I'm naked!
|