Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > Calif. Top Court Annuls San Francisco Gay Marriages
Pages (5): « 1 2 3 4 [5]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
TuanAnh213
ahhh...Du Du Du Du Du



Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA...Cheah!!

quote:
Originally posted by torontotrance
I knew your pathetic self would show up, I don't care if you think my arguments are valid.


dude you automatically win the argument with that comment rite there


___________________
*** Sig edited -> image exceeds 50k byte size restriction
http://wsm.ezsitedesigner.com/share/scrapbook/19/196003/gayslater.gif

Old Post Aug-16-2004 06:42  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for TuanAnh213 Click here to Send TuanAnh213 a Private Message Visit TuanAnh213's homepage! Add TuanAnh213 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
arctic
Teh Pwn



Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Australia

quote:
Originally posted by DrUg_Tit0
Exactly, to have a marriage, you need to have two consenting individuals. A dog is pretty much unable to make a consentual statement. A parrot, on the other hand...hmm...what if you teach a parrot to say "I do", "I want a divorce", and "I want an attorney"? I guess that's the place where the line becomes blurred...

I think there's also a condition that a human can knowingly consent to a marriage -- and it has to be informed consent. In other words, they actually have to know what they're doing when they agree to get married.

Until someone can demonstrate to me that a parrot has the brain power to actually comprehend language and to rationalize at an adult level, i'm satisfied that a parrot can't consent.

Old Post Aug-16-2004 08:35  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for arctic Click here to Send arctic a Private Message Add arctic to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
arctic
Teh Pwn



Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Australia

quote:
Originally posted by speedracer_mec
I'll agree to gay 'marriage' when they agree to polygamy styled 'marriages'.

I agree that polygamous marriage should be legal -- i've thought that for some time now. I myself would never have one, but I don't see why other people should be banned from shacking up with more than one person if they're that way inclined.

quote:
Let's have some consistency in public policy, instead of saying it's ok to treat a certain group as second class folk, and not another group.

The polygamy argument isn't as prominent or emotive because 'polygamy' isn't an inherent sexual orientation -- it's just a type of relationship entered into by heterosexuals (or homosexuals in some cases). Because of that, I can't envisage a situation in which there is a big 'polygamous rights!' movement as there is with gays and lesbians at present. But in essence I agree with you, I just think that it's going to take a lot longer to be made legal than gay marriage will.

Old Post Aug-16-2004 08:39  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for arctic Click here to Send arctic a Private Message Add arctic to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DrUg_Tit0
e^(i*pi)+1=0



Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Zagreb, Croatia

quote:
Originally posted by arctic
I think there's also a condition that a human can knowingly consent to a marriage -- and it has to be informed consent. In other words, they actually have to know what they're doing when they agree to get married.

Until someone can demonstrate to me that a parrot has the brain power to actually comprehend language and to rationalize at an adult level, i'm satisfied that a parrot can't consent.


Hm, but how about that gorilla that knows sign language? Ha, gotcha now!


___________________
1+1=10

Old Post Aug-16-2004 11:20  Croatia
Click Here to See the Profile for DrUg_Tit0 Click here to Send DrUg_Tit0 a Private Message Add DrUg_Tit0 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
discojoe
GO SENS



Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Ottawa Canada

150 years ago Christianity condoned and encouraged racism, and didnt recognize women as people. If you take the bible literally, men are clearly superior to women. And its true of course, we are superior because the bible says it.

Don't worry people, one day people like torontotrance and other religious extremists will come around and rescognize homosexuals are people too and deserve the same rights as we do. And people will recognize, just because they were born a little differently, like black people and women, doesnt mean they dont deserve the same basic human rights white males do.

And its sad really because people like that claim they represent the Christian religion. The christian right isnt the Christian religion. I was born into a Christian (and roman catholic at that) family and community and I so rarely see that kind of bigotry and intolerance. The Christian family, schools and community i was born into promote tolerance and respect for people and their basic human rights. This is why the majority of Canada didnt have a problem when it was legalized. It was the right thing to do.

If you believe homosexuals are born homosexuals and you are Christian, you believe they were made in 'God's image'. If you don't believe they are born the way they are, then go do some homework and read up.

ps. Adam and eve didnt exist.

Last edited by discojoe on Aug-16-2004 at 13:44

Old Post Aug-16-2004 13:38  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for discojoe Click here to Send discojoe a Private Message Add discojoe to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
arctic
Teh Pwn



Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Australia

quote:
Originally posted by DrUg_Tit0
Hm, but how about that gorilla that knows sign language? Ha, gotcha now!

Can the gorilla in question explain what the word 'marriage' means, or can it simply indicate'yes' when asked if it would like one? Furthermore, can the gorilla actually go up and ask for a marriage, or does it have to be prompted?

Old Post Aug-18-2004 03:54  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for arctic Click here to Send arctic a Private Message Add arctic to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > Calif. Top Court Annuls San Francisco Gay Marriages
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (5): « 1 2 3 4 [5]  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackold skool sasha sample...1994... [2004] [1]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackRitmo - G 13 (Evolution Remix) [2004]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 16:00.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!