Originally posted by loconet
Wtf, you telling me I don't have coverage in Yellowknife? Outrage!
no, but there's always the option of morse code
___________________
Palm Trees > Pine Trees , Sand > Snow
Nov-08-2004 17:35
harcourt
Listening to the sounds
Registered: Mar 2001
Location: Toronto
quote:
Originally posted by dEsidEL
it seems that existing Fido customers are gonna have it worse than existing Rogers ones .. while Rogers users will be able to roam on the Fido network at no additional charge, Fido customers will only be able to do the same on the Rogers network FREE for the next 3 months, after that, they're required to pay an additional $5 for network access..
That seems reasonable, considering it's only Fido users who are interested in roaming on the "other" network. Technically, there are no areas that Fido operates in that Rogers does not. Therefore, charging money for it would be pointless as no one would buy it. But for Fido users you gain a lot from it, therefore they have something they can sell.
Nov-08-2004 18:13
dEsidEL
Fu Man Choonz
Registered: Aug 2000
Location: Below the Belt
quote:
Originally posted by tw1tch
That seems reasonable, considering it's only Fido users who are interested in roaming on the "other" network. Technically, there are no areas that Fido operates in that Rogers does not. Therefore, charging money for it would be pointless as no one would buy it. But for Fido users you gain a lot from it, therefore they have something they can sell.
that's true , but i still think that Fido has better coverage in urban areas
___________________
Palm Trees > Pine Trees , Sand > Snow
Nov-08-2004 18:18
StereoPrincess
sassy one-piece
Registered: May 2001
Location: SPFRI
quote:
Originally posted by loconet
Wtf, you telling me I don't have coverage in Yellowknife? Outrage!
most people it doesn't make a difference but i travel up north a bit and there isn't any coverage past Barrie on Fido.
so what i will do is probably just order the better coverage when i'm going somewhere and get rid of it once i don't need it anymore.
Nov-08-2004 18:22
StereoPrincess
sassy one-piece
Registered: May 2001
Location: SPFRI
quote:
Originally posted by tw1tch
That seems reasonable, considering it's only Fido users who are interested in roaming on the "other" network. Technically, there are no areas that Fido operates in that Rogers does not. Therefore, charging money for it would be pointless as no one would buy it. But for Fido users you gain a lot from it, therefore they have something they can sell.
umm, no it doesn't seem reasonable. do rogers customers pay more in general? if they do then it might make sense, but if they don't then a 5 dollars extra charge still goes to the same company so what's it to them. it seems like they still want people to switch to rogers wireless.
Nov-08-2004 18:24
dEsidEL
Fu Man Choonz
Registered: Aug 2000
Location: Below the Belt
quote:
Originally posted by StereoPrincess
umm, no it doesn't seem reasonable. do rogers customers pay more in general? if they do then it might make sense, but if they don't then a 5 dollars extra charge still goes to the same company so what's it to them. it seems like they still want people to switch to rogers wireless.
wells according to those 2 links, it seems that Rogers wants to evetually integrate the 2 networks into 1 seemless one, but until that happens, theyr're gonna charge the Fido users a premium for that value added service ..
personally i get by fine with the coverage i have so far, as long as they don't start meddling with my existing plan !
___________________
Palm Trees > Pine Trees , Sand > Snow
Nov-08-2004 18:50
Skipper
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2002
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by dEsidEL
exactly man .. Fido has always come up with more innovative services and a much more competitive pricing plan that its competitors. as the smallest carrier it has the least amount of capital to invest in its network. if only it had more money or if the CDN government allowed greater foreign ownership in the telcos Fido would seriously give the bigger 3 a run for their money..
some of you Rogers and Telus users might be rejoicing by this news.. but in the end IMHO i think it'll just be bad for everyone..
Fido has the worst service I've ever experienced though. It doesn't matter that they have an innovative pricing plan when I can't get service in my own home, or they don't tell me when I have new voice mail waiting.
Nov-08-2004 19:21
AdReNaLiNa
Arminized!
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: in mah cubicle
I'm so gonna miss those awesome Fido commercials at the movies
Originally posted by Skipper
Fido has the worst service I've ever experienced though. It doesn't matter that they have an innovative pricing plan when I can't get service in my own home, or they don't tell me when I have new voice mail waiting.
i haven't had that problem before .. but it helps no one if those pricing plans disappear. it only helps the big 3 try to maintain the status quo
___________________
Palm Trees > Pine Trees , Sand > Snow
Nov-09-2004 11:17
discojoe
GO SENS
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Ottawa Canada
Wireless isnt THAT expensive in Canada and we have the best fixed line system system that i know of. People all around the world are shocked to know we have free local calls.
Nov-09-2004 18:17
dEsidEL
Fu Man Choonz
Registered: Aug 2000
Location: Below the Belt
quote:
Originally posted by discojoe
Wireless isnt THAT expensive in Canada and we have the best fixed line system system that i know of. People all around the world are shocked to know we have free local calls.
i was equally as shocked to see that everyone else outside had free incoming calls on their mobiles and that we didn't
except for that Fido unlimited incoming calls plan
___________________
Palm Trees > Pine Trees , Sand > Snow