 |
|
|
|
 |
Earthsnail
Senior tranceaddict

Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
|
|
It's not that ipods are bad, it's just that people are getting ripped off by them...I'm not aware of the exact price, but I think a regular 20 gb ipod is about 400 dollars. With Ipods, battery life sucks compared to so many other audio mp3 players. With iriver models, you can play videos and music with certain models, and all of the models come with an FM tuner. And if I'm not mistaken, certain models have about the same amount of battery life as a regular Ipod if not more, for about the same price as Ipod if not less. Iriver is not the only manufacturer like this. Archos and Creative are also companies that give you more for your money. I have a Creative Zen NOMAD Xtra that holds 40GB of files and has 14 hours of battery life, and I got it for $236.00 (USD). Of course the only reason why Ipod gets all of the sales is simply because they advertise more, and it looks better. So to those who are considering getting an Ipod, I ask you to please reconsider, because you will be dissappointed. That is of course you like spending too much money and getting a piece of crap...
|
|
Dec-05-2004 16:55
|
|
|
 |
 |
Earthsnail
Senior tranceaddict

Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
|
|
|
Dec-05-2004 17:16
|
|
|
 |
 |
Tranceporter99
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Jan 2004
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by dj_mdma
I was considering the Hi-MD range from Sony, but then i figured that 1 gig isnt' really enough its also quite expensive, but they do look good and they do have the excellent function of RECORDING!
I don't like iRiver's because they just don't "look" that nice tbh, although of course, it is a matter of opinion.
iPods are nice, but everyman and his dog has one, and why be like everyone else? also battery life has been said to be teh suxor.
so i went and got this instead:

battery life is up to 30hours at optimum performance, so i can see myself getting about 24 hours at my volume levels and file encoding. Atrac3 processing may be a bit of a bugger as it means you have to convert MP3's but the process isn't really that long. Atrac3 files are also better quality than mp3. And very few people have this, so i'm so much more elite than those ipod users |
umm, im gonna have to disagree, maybe the battery life is longer, which I cant stand. But Atrac3(I had a NetMD walkman) is terriable sound quality, its encoded at 32kbs while normally Mp3s are at 96kbs.
___________________


|
|
Dec-05-2004 18:01
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:53.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|