 |
|
|
|
 |
Jayx1
Prime Minister of TOTA
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: The Socialist People's Republic Of Canada
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DigiNut
Hahahaha, that's a good one.
If you want to call oppressive Leftism something other than "liberal" then that's fine and dandy, but don't call it "conservative"! |
I consider someone conservative if anything "extreme" is offensive to them. Most Canadian "liberals" would freak out over real life encounters with most of the people they tried to defend. Whats more, most Canadian "liberals" envelope conservative ideas aside from a few media sexy fad issues that make themselves feel good such as gay marriage.
Im a true Liberal in many ways because my attitude is that if it doesnt harm someone else, you should be able to do whatever you please. This boils down to EVERY aspect of life. I hold conservative ideals however when it comes to how our government should spend our money.
___________________
| quote: | Originally posted by jester
Everything in this country is illegal. |
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery…" Winston Churchill
"If you have ten thousand regulations you destroy all respect for the law" - Winston Churchill
|
|
Dec-10-2004 03:40
|
|
|
 |
 |
DigiNut
You kids get off my lawn!

Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto, Self-proclaimed Centre of the Universe
|
|
|
No Jay, you're a pseudo-anarchist. You may claim to be liberal but one need look no further than your pro-tobacco arguments to recognize that you appear to be against laws of any kind, no matter what their purposes are.
The liberalism you're talking about is the old Liberal Capitalism, which is what I believe in - the three inalienable rights (life, private property, and the pursuit of happiness) and the role of government in protecting those rights, which means criminalization of any behaviour that directly infringes on someone else's rights. In your case, you hold private property rights near and dear but don't seem to recognize the other two beyond the terminally obvious like first-degree murder.
So please, don't go around calling yourself a liberal, because you're not a liberal by either the post-modern definition or the conventional definition. And Canadian Liberals are certainly not conservatives in disguise, because most of them genuinely believe in the tax-and-spend economy in addition to all those "fad" left-wing media issues. I understand the reasoning you're using - that "liberal" implies "freedom" and the hard left is far too oppressive to rightly be placed in that category, but "conservative" implies traditional values, traditional wisdom and a small government, which is even further from the reality.
Please Jay - the last thing we need is yet another form of equivocation thrown into the mix here. You've got a pretty good track record for not getting wrapped up in asinine semantic debates - so keep that up and don't try to get any deeper into this one.
And to the rest - sorry to veer off topic so much, but semantics and equivocation (á là Chomsky) are one of my pet peeves.
___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here
|
|
Dec-10-2004 04:23
|
|
|
 |
 |
Jayx1
Prime Minister of TOTA
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: The Socialist People's Republic Of Canada
|
|
|
I agree that semantics are silly. However i must say that I am not against law and order. I am against governments or organizations dictating how one should live life. I am against social engieneering by any means other than unbiased education. My #1 belief is that the government should only help you break a habit, lifestyle, etc when you ask for that help and that it is their duty to provide the proper education you need to know the consequences of unhealthy beaviour whether it be drugs, smoking, alcohol, sex etc.
Im also against double standards. People who stand there and preach to me about the dangers of second hand smoke and then go on to start a thread about the joys of pot smoking come to mind.
___________________
| quote: | Originally posted by jester
Everything in this country is illegal. |
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery…" Winston Churchill
"If you have ten thousand regulations you destroy all respect for the law" - Winston Churchill
|
|
Dec-10-2004 05:08
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
rabbitjoker
aural sadist

Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Jayx1
But i DO NOT think a child should have 2 mommies or two daddies or a mommy and no daddy or a daddy and no mommy. It is my belief that whatever the arrangement, it is essential for a child to have both a stable male and female role model in their life. |
I disagree.
I won't get into intimate personal details - but my mother has been the BEST role model I've had in my life (father, step-father or otherwise) and I like to think that as a result both my brother and myself have ended up to be happy, contributing, successful and good people.
Having a mommy or daddy (or both, or two) isn't what results in a child growing up to be a happy, contributing, successful, good person.
Being in a home where a child knows that they are loved and supported unconditionally, a home that sets reasonable limits/rules, communicates them effectively and enforces consequences if they are transgressed and overall sets forth a good role model for a child to follow is what produces a good outcome.
It is ESSENTIAL for a child to have a strong support structure (moral, academic and otherwise) - and that is not interdependent on both a male or female role model for parental figures. Such an environment can be created with a single parent, both parents, a community, other family members or any other loving relationship.
Your views are nuclear family-esque - and frankly based on my experience, applying the 1950's cookie-cutter approach to our rapidly evolving society no longer is appropriate.
___________________
- rabbit.joker [funny¿rabbit] | www.rabbitjoker.com |www.ddtt.org
Dark Dirty Tech Tribal. | Hands in air (trance) and feet on the floor (house).
Last edited by rabbitjoker on Dec-10-2004 at 06:04
|
|
Dec-10-2004 05:34
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:18.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|