|
Hey. Sonar 4 is indeed great. I do use it on occasion but much less than FL Studio because I love the free form layout in FL Studio. I find it more productive with my needs. Sonar 4 definantly ranks up there with Cubase though. Cakewalk has been around for a very long time and they have strived in creating very good software. Thier PR department unfortunatley sucks so they dont have nearly as large of a market share in the world of Trance and EDM when compared to Cubase and many other hosts. It doesnt natively support VSTs though and that is a big minus. Though, for credit, they have created an almost flawless vst conversion program that takes VSTs and makes them DXs. Another issue I have with it, is thier lack of built in instruments and effects. It does come with several good lexicon reverbs including surround reverbs which are really fun to mess with but outside of that, many of thier plugins are lacking and or redundant. The only real synth built in is DreamStation which in all honesty, has some great potential, but being the only worthwhile instrument in the $1000 ($500 for the slitely stripped one) package is pretty sad. The only thing Sonar has going for it is its great multitracking abilities. In some instances, it kicks the crap out of Cubase. So where the line is drawn is if you have a lot of hardware and want to keep using hardware without software synths/effects, definantly go for Sonar, you wont regret it. If you are looking to do a mix of softsynths/effects and hardware while having a bit less in the realm of multitracking abilities, go for Cubase.
Just trying to show that Sonar isnt the best piece of software out there, just that it has its own very special place in music production.
Cheers,
Zac
___________________
DarkSword - Turn On
DarkSword - Hell Bound
DarkSword - Fresh
DarkSword - Styled
DarkSword - Shadowed Sun
DarkSword - Turning Forward
DarkSword - ALLFRUIT
Pacific Mint vs DarkSword - Climax Zone 2005
SoundClick Page
 
---FL Studio 9 User---
|