|
| quote: |
Moolow posted:
There's nothing wrong with this tune. very good overalltrack! But, it sounds a bit old. It could have been taken from an old ravemission or trancemaster(for example) from 1994 or 1995.
Keep it up! |
THANKS! that's exactly what I was going for, a classic rave sound! I'm glad you enjoyed it
| quote: |
Nullistic said:
yeah that's a pretty powerful quote right there. it hits me hard, but makes me laugh at the same time.
In all seriousness, I heard the track as well, and I wasn't surprised. Just as previously stated, when someone puts up a title thread like that, it just screams "Look at me! I'm pro now! My track is GOOD, no if ands or butts about it!" But you did say you didn't intend on making it seem that way. Tip: Next time, just post up a simple thread, "New track, check it out guys". It somehow grabs more people's attention more so than "NEW TRACK! RECORD LABEL DEAL!", you know what I mean.
Although I never spend much time getting into flame wars, or even bothering (I see it as pointless sometimes), this one just caught my eye. My recommendation, keep producing, don't let this "label" get to your head, and as someone else stated, always keep progressing with your sound. Be diverse with your music, aim for different sounds, but the key is produce produce produce. If a label sees that you can't keep up with the times, and just sticking to the same old sounds, then how do you expect your music to sell? You have to be able to show the label different sides of your music and sound all the time. Well, heh, not THIS label you're signed with anyway, they seem to be accepting anything remotely related to christian belief, no matter how bad* it is :P. |
thanks for the advice! ya, I tried to change the title of this thread but it doesn't show up in the list as changed...
There's a lot of other people who really enjoy this track so I wouldn't say that the label made a mistake...
| quote: |
TOR said:
this actually sounds alright.. some very interesting sounds in there.
it could use some work, though. the kick is drowned by the bassline, and the track doesn't seem to have a defined structure. also, the melody you introduce round about 07:00 is very cheesy indeed, you should have left that one out.
this track has potential, though.. i'd love to hear a full on psy mix of this |
thanks! You're right about the kick and bass, hopefully that will get changed. thanks. I'm actually co-producing some psy trance right now so that influence probably caused a lot of the randomness. If I ever do a psy remix, I'll let you know!
|