|
^ because your argument fell into the "slippery slope" category. just bc there is less driving (say, 5% less driving), doesn't mean that an entire country is going to shit. your argument is kind of like saying that if someone smokes weed, then they'll do e, then coke, then speed, then heroin and they'll become an addict and be a complete waste of space. basically what i'm saying is that yes, in theory it MAY happen but in reality, the chances of a country's entire gdp going down so much that the country goes to shit is very slim to none.
why?
because bishes gotta do shit. people gotta get things done, live their lives. so they find alternatives. they rebuild, renew-- they find solutions.
(btw, USA is not the richest country in the world, to whoever said that. i'm pretty sure that per capibeacta, it may be Norway. not 100% sure tho.)
___________________
>>Bestest Video EvAr<<
|