State funded sex?

Become a part of the TranceAddict community!

Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven't

TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > State funded sex?

Pages (5): « 1 2 3 4 [5]

Last Thread Next Thread

Author

Thread

Gmoney part II
tranceaddict

Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Boston

quote:
Originally posted by Renegade
The 10 richest people in the US:

1) William Henry Gates:

2) Warren Edward Buffett:

3) Paul G. Allen:

4) Michael Dell:

5) Lawrence Ellison:

6) Christy Walton:

7) Jim Walton:

8) S. Robson Walton:

9) Alice Walton:

10) Helen Walton:

Any other misconceptions you want clearing up while I'm here?

I will now re-quote myself from page 3 of this thread (had you cared to read it you might actually come up with some kind of coherent argument).

This is taken from page 3
My theory of survival of the fittest( well, its not mine but I have adapted it to my needs) works. I will tell you why. Women want to procreate with the men that are most viable. Good-looking smart men have the best chance of being successful in this world. Of course there are exceptions, like one can develop a drug addiction ,etc.But, if you look at the odds, this will hold true. So while Jethro can procreate with his obese wife in some West Virginian hovel, there children won't do better than any of either of them. However, someone like Brad Pitt will never have sex with this obesity because he has better options(i.e. supermodels)
However, a guy who is 5'2 that is smart and has other attributes may also be successful. So when he drives by in his new Ferrari F430, the women will go for it. The point here is this: People are successful for a reason and people wind up at the bottom for a reason. It doesn't matter what the reason is but there is a reason.
Michael Jordan got cut from his highschool basketball team his freshmen year. But because Jordan had something inside him besides his athletic ability, he became the best basketball player in the world (not to mention a multi-multi millionare.)
Bill Gates dropped out of college. But instead of seving mozzarella sticks at his local Olive Garden, he became the richest man in the world. He also had something inside him that drove him to this goal.
Both Michael Jordan and Bill Gates can have any woman they want because they are "the fittest", they have the resources (i.e. money) that women want. Its the like the whole thing with alpha-male and beta-female theory in animals. So while good-looking smart people have the best chance in life, other people have a chance too (just not as much of one).[B]

___________________
A KINDER AND GENTLER GMONEY

Oct-12-2005 02:31 United States

Verona^My
full on addict

Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, NY

quote:
Originally posted by Psy-T
you might need sex to have a healthier psyche, but you certainly don't need it to have it to survive. that's why it's ludicrous to compare it with the necessity for food.

Try living a healthy lifestyle for 75 years without eating food.

Try the same without sex...

Nuff said, thank you very much. Now give me my $10 bucks for winning this argument.

___________________
Current fav albums

DNA, kick me up
Protoculture, Circadians

Oct-12-2005 04:01 United States

Click here to Send Verona^My a Private Message

Alex
Suck a cheetah's dick

Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Montreal

Determined priests and nuns do it...

___________________

Oct-12-2005 04:03 Canada

Click here to Send Alex a Private Message

Verona^My
full on addict

Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, NY

quote:
Originally posted by metalgearsolid
^^^I thought the number one thing girls look for is security. By security I mean money and if someone has money than that person has security and that is what all girls look for. I am sorry HTP I think you are wrong and Gmoney obviously is wrong as well but he has a clue.

Then how do the drunkin loser bad boys give a women security by beating her?

How does that logic work?

Most of these types are neither wealthy, nor smart, nor do they offer security. LOL

___________________
Current fav albums

DNA, kick me up
Protoculture, Circadians

Oct-12-2005 04:06 United States

Verona^My
full on addict

Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, NY

quote:
Originally posted by Yoepus
WTF is wrong with you man?!

Say a person loses his legs in an airplane accident - one that killed 200 people and he is the lone survivor. With his legs he lost his charmingly good looks and no women will sleep with him anymore.

Does not mean that he is evolutionarly unfit to have had offsprings? Had he been full-functioning he could very well of had kids and helped produce airplane accident resistant spawn. But you would have no say about it because "evolution" told him to lose his legs and become unattractive

seriously, how old are you?

LOL, you guys have absolutely no clue about anything. One of the biggest problems people create for the next generation is choosing a bad mate. Ever hear of single moms, you know, the ones with the deadbeat dads, or the ones where the father was arrested for armed robbery and isn't there for the children cause he's stupid.

How about the women who choose danger over security and date guys who beat them. Evolutionary fit you say... Maybe. Perhaps a woman who dated such a guy could tell us her reason for dating such imbeciles.

She might say, well I was looking for security and safety, but that wasn't available so I chose the dude who beat me instead. Anything is better than nothing in a woman's mind I guess.

I think we should put feminism aside and create a man's movement dedicated to fixing the female condition instead. LOL

___________________
Current fav albums

DNA, kick me up
Protoculture, Circadians

Oct-12-2005 04:16 United States

Yoepus
Neo-condimist

Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Ketchup fields, Texas

quote:
Originally posted by Verona^My
LOL, you guys have absolutely no clue about anything. One of the biggest problems people create for the next generation is choosing a bad mate. Ever hear of single moms, you know, the ones with the deadbeat dads, or the ones where the father was arrested for armed robbery and isn't there for the children cause he's stupid.

How about the women who choose danger over security and date guys who beat them. Evolutionary fit you say... Maybe. Perhaps a woman who dated such a guy could tell us her reason for dating such imbeciles.

She might say, well I was looking for security and safety, but that wasn't available so I chose the dude who beat me instead. Anything is better than nothing in a woman's mind I guess.

I think we should put feminism aside and create a man's movement dedicated to fixing the female condition instead. LOL

wtf you quote me on that

___________________
SAVE ZIONIST MUSTARD: BUY ZIONIST KETCHUP!

Click here to support the free mustard alliance.

Oct-12-2005 04:20 Israel

Click here to Send Yoepus a Private Message

metalgearsolid
I am a sexist

Registered: Apr 2005
Location: For you neo/

quote:
Originally posted by Verona^My
Then how do the drunkin loser bad boys give a women security by beating her?

How does that logic work?

Most of these types are neither wealthy, nor smart, nor do they offer security. LOL

Verona I never meant guys who beat thier wifes. Hitting a girl is very wrong and also insulting her. Its why I am always a sucker when a girl asks for my help. I can't say no .

Most women who marry abusive husbands; were abused when they were younger. They are victims and they don't know anybetter.

Lots of Women marry men who are like thier father.