 |
|
|
|
 |
IDarkISwordI
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Clay Center, USA
|
|
|
Nov-09-2005 23:35
|
|
|
 |
 |
mux
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: East Van, BC, Canada
|
|
|
The point isn't that you can press your own vinyl, it's that someone is willing to do it for you, and take the financial risk, and handle the distribution. They're willing to gamble the reputation of their label, and cash out of their pocket, that your music is good enough to sell enough copies that they don't lose their shirt in the deal.
If you shop around, you can get 300 records pressed for about $800. If you're pressing your own music, it's called a "vanity pressing". Everyone I know who has done that still has 150 copies of their record in their basement. Getting rid of 300 records costs a *lot* more than just the costs of pressing them.
Do any of you folks who are saying MP3 releases are just as good as vinyl have any vinyl releases?
___________________
(hey, where's your laptop?)
http://mux.ca <-- techno lives here.
|
|
Nov-10-2005 00:18
|
|
|
 |
 |
mux
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: East Van, BC, Canada
|
|
|
that's called business. you apparently have no idea how this record thing works.
say you're an underground record label, and you sign a track and give the artist $500 cash for it. then you put up $4500 cash (and many, many hours of work) for vinyl pressing, cover printing, shipping, distribution and promotion of the artist. you press 1000 records, and sell them to the distributor for $7 each, and what do you know, most of them sell! the record makes $5500 GROSS, then many months later, the distributor sends you a cheque. yay, you made about double what you paid the artist.
otoh, if the record only makes $1500 gross (and the distributor returns all the unsold copies, and charges you for shipping), the artist still gets paid, and you take the $3000 hit. that's called 'risk'.
*most* records never turn a profit. seriously.
that's just how the dance record industry works. the real question is, if it's so obviously a terrible business to be in, why bother?
the only reason is for the love of the music - and that's why people running labels deserve some respect.
___________________
(hey, where's your laptop?)
http://mux.ca <-- techno lives here.
|
|
Nov-10-2005 01:27
|
|
|
 |
 |
DRM
I Choose Noise

Registered: Mar 2001
Location: Somewhere where it's raining
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by mux
that's called business. you apparently have no idea how this record thing works.
say you're an underground record label, and you sign a track and give the artist $500 cash for it. then you put up $4500 cash (and many, many hours of work) for vinyl pressing, cover printing, shipping, distribution and promotion of the artist. you press 1000 records, and sell them to the distributor for $7 each, and what do you know, most of them sell! the record makes $5500 GROSS, then many months later, the distributor sends you a cheque. yay, you made about double what you paid the artist.
otoh, if the record only makes $1500 gross (and the distributor returns all the unsold copies, and charges you for shipping), the artist still gets paid, and you take the $3000 hit. that's called 'risk'.
*most* records never turn a profit. seriously.
that's just how the dance record industry works. the real question is, if it's so obviously a terrible business to be in, why bother?
the only reason is for the love of the music - and that's why people running labels deserve some respect. |
you are either djlithium under another name or a repressed ex label man because you sound very bitter. Artists know fine well how much money a label is putting behind them to do well, but imo the problem with labels today is they will sign any old shite.
a couple of years ago there were about 2-3 artists signed from this forum and they were damn well happy about it. Nowadays these startout labels come on here, ask for new music and will sign anything that sounds remotely professional, as opposed to being a great track that sounds professional, there's a huge difference.
This is the whole problem with trance today imo. Its not that the artist (in here and everywhere else) are copying others ideas in a sense and making great but similar tracks to the well known producers but that labels are saying hey that sounds ok, lets release it.
What needs to happen is that the people making tracks and lets face it, we all as producers start by emulating what we like from others in one way or another, leave them to that. Then, when and if they have the talent they will show that a year or two later when they find their "own sound". It's at this point the labels should come in any say "hey we've been listening to the last few tracks of yours and we feel like it's something that we as a label would like to sign"
So yeah these people need to stop starting labels here there and everywhere thinking hey i have a friend who produces professional sounding trance im going to release it:
A) The person you're signing is probably still in the "creating a sound phase"
B) You don't have a clue how to run a label
and most of all :
C) If you dont have A or B sorted at the very least then you are going to fall flat on your arse, after or often before your first release.
So lets please go back to a situation where there are great labels that will only take la creme de la creme. That way, you as a label will not fall on your arse and more to the point the artist being signed can actually take a huge amount of gratitude from being signed and realise at that point they have made it, rather than both of you realising all you've reached is mediocrity.
___________________
EDM Blog
Hybrid - Break My Soul + Mixes
BT - These Hopeful Machines
Gorillaz - Stylo
Last edited by DRM on Nov-10-2005 at 02:01
|
|
Nov-10-2005 01:51
|
|
|
 |
 |
mux
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: East Van, BC, Canada
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DRM
you are either djlithium under another name or a repressed ex label man because you sound very bitter. |
Heh, no. check my .sig, I'm Drew, aka "mux". I met Lithium at a unix security conference once in like 2000, I doubt he remembers me.
I've never been signed to a label, 'cause I'm a terrible studio engineer. I'm a pretty good live-pa tho, which has had me hanging out with a lot of folks who are either signed to or running labels.
| quote: | | So yeah these people need to stop starting labels here there and everywhere thinking hey i have a friend who produces professional sounding trance im going to release it. |
I agree 100% with everything you said.
The *vast* majority of labels never hit ten vinyl releases. Black Tiger has apparently done six already, which is pretty impressive for 2005.
___________________
(hey, where's your laptop?)
http://mux.ca <-- techno lives here.
|
|
Nov-10-2005 02:08
|
|
|
 |
 |
DigiNut
You kids get off my lawn!

Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto, Self-proclaimed Centre of the Universe
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by mux
that's called business. you apparently have no idea how this record thing works.
say you're an underground record label, and you sign a track and give the artist $500 cash for it. then you put up $4500 cash (and many, many hours of work) for vinyl pressing, cover printing, shipping, distribution and promotion of the artist. you press 1000 records, and sell them to the distributor for $7 each, and what do you know, most of them sell! the record makes $5500 GROSS, then many months later, the distributor sends you a cheque. yay, you made about double what you paid the artist.
otoh, if the record only makes $1500 gross (and the distributor returns all the unsold copies, and charges you for shipping), the artist still gets paid, and you take the $3000 hit. that's called 'risk'.
*most* records never turn a profit. seriously.
that's just how the dance record industry works. the real question is, if it's so obviously a terrible business to be in, why bother?
the only reason is for the love of the music - and that's why people running labels deserve some respect. |
Hate to break it to you, but I understand very well how the industry works, and the record label will be an endangered species within 10 years.
The distribution cost of music today is near zero. Labels are merely a "stamp of approval", and that is only still true because of the market saturation of trance music and the stigma of being an "amateur producer". That stigma only exists because inexpensive production tools are relatively new - it will disappear completely eventually, and at that point in time, the record label will be defunct (or at the very least, a bit player in the music industry).
___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here
|
|
Nov-10-2005 02:18
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
jetflag
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Leeuwarden, Holland
|
|
|
"Please ignore these clowns???"
with that kind of additude no-1 will send you stuff
and as for the "anti-digital-dj-concept".... welcome to the future m8
___________________
https://aeriummusic.bandcamp.com/
https://aeriumambient.bandcamp.com/
|
|
Nov-10-2005 08:47
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:10.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|