 |
|
|
|
 |
AngusG
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Brisbane
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by starstarman
How do you define their progression being "extremely good" then? 90% of the melody is in major key, ok there's nth wrong with major but the progression is almost repeatedly going thru a perfect cadence or even staying on the I. That is good? And lately their bassline is even more horrid. Just exactly a simple square pulse in low pass. |
actually not true... the most gabriel and dresden productions and remixes i've listened to (and had a long think before replying) have been in a minor key... and call me stupid... but the bassline in a lot of quality dance music is based on a similar formula...
bit of trivia... Josh Gabriel played an two stringed electric bass on Arcadia and Around You (from memory)...
and as for progression?? i think their productions progress very nicely
___________________
MySpace
|
|
Jan-31-2006 14:09
|
|
|
 |
 |
Col
Strachan
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Montreal, QC
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by starstarman
I dunno if you have taken any musical education. There are a lot of theories behind, in any criteria like melodic progression, harmonic progression, emotional expression, etc. And there are other studio technics, history knowledge, producing skills, etc. that can be discussed and commented. |
True.
Musical merit and originality doesn't seem to matter to some people, as long as they like it then it should be allowed to be considered "good music". Obviously I'm not trying to claim liking a type of music isn't subjective or a matter of taste, but I'm afraid some music just IS objectively poor.
"Opinion" carries no weight in these cases, people just throw the word around to excuse their own ignorance.
___________________
Strachan :: DJ & Producer :: Official Website
|
|
Jan-31-2006 14:17
|
|
|
 |
 |
Col
Strachan
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Montreal, QC
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
To me, great music is about creativity. An incredibly competent but desperately uncreative musician will sound dull. So really, whether or not G&D are any good has less to do with the technical complexity of their music and more to do with how good the art they construct is. So you can't objectively decide that they are bad artists based on how good musicians they are- you can only justify why their artistic expression does not appeal to you. |
I'd agree with that. Be aware that by "musical merit and originality" I didn't necessarily mean technical aspects, I just meant musical aspects.
Their productions seem to me to be very dull and simple - and I don't mean simple as in artistic and minimal; I mean simple as in that they don't spend enough time on them and that they are not fulfilling and creative enough to be considered decent pieces of music.
___________________
Strachan :: DJ & Producer :: Official Website
|
|
Jan-31-2006 14:35
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
peterdjsgirl
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Austin, TX TA#2 / SF
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by miamitranceman
Nicol Spomberg - Resurrection (G&D Remix) <--- most underrated G&D track EVER! |
a personal favorite
on another note... I've been reading and thinking about some of the stuff being said... especially about the "musical talent" etc ... My 2 cents- and this can be applied to any music or musician, why are they doing what they are doing? Is the point to create a technically perfect peice of music for the sake of following the rules, or is the point to try and capture an emotion or idea that people will understand and, in this case, want to dance to. I enjoy Gabriel & Dresden, and personally I am very ok that they are not everyones "cup of tea". I just disagree that they are lacking in the area of musical expertise. I really think it's more that some people don't enjoy how they have chosen to write, produce or remix the music. (fyi-I have had musical training, my husband is a musician and I have friends that are accomplished musicians... and not just in the dance music genre)
___________________
"und Ich tanz einfach weiter"
|
|
Feb-01-2006 09:26
|
|
|
 |
 |
Col
Strachan
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Montreal, QC
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by peterdjsgirl
My 2 cents- and this can be applied to any music or musician, why are they doing what they are doing? Is the point to create a technically perfect peice of music for the sake of following the rules, or is the point to try and capture an emotion or idea that people will understand and, in this case, want to dance to. |
I don't think that's a particularly strong argument - people will "want to dance" to any old cheese, providing it's catchy and has a basic rhythm. Crediting someone for making a dance track danceable is like crediting someone for baking a cake that's edible. It's what you do on top of the basic principles which distinguishes one producer from another.
As for "capturing an emotion", that phrase in itself is touch-and-go, and I could say the same for quite a few artists. In that recent review of Markus Schulz's album on trancecritic.com, the reviewer used the phrase "faux-emotional trappings" which I think could be applied to G&D as well. People only regard it "emotional" because there are pretty vocals and twinkling guitars. That's not really raw emotion; it's forced, the listener is drowned in the stuff, with an extra helping on top to make sure they're won over.
And in response to your comments on music theory, I would agree that no-one should entirely abide by "rules" - that's what makes music boring. But you're missing the point of music theory. Once you are aware of the principles of music, you go out to expand upon or completely invert those principles, that's how you get to be considered creative. It almost sounded like you're saying people with any knowledge of music theory are MORE likely to create formulaic pieces and abide by rules, which really isn't the case at all.
Besides, I can't claim to know (and really couldn't care less) the extent of G&D's knowledge of music theory, and I don't think it matters much with this kind of music. But I still feel they aren't creative enough - they're trying to mix genres in an attempt to be original, and when one of those genres is "pop" then you're set out to fail from day one.
___________________
Strachan :: DJ & Producer :: Official Website
|
|
Feb-01-2006 11:37
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:27.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|