Registered: Dec 2003
Location: in the jungle the mighty jungle
Now here this all meat lovers...
In my good ole hometown of windsor their is a meat challenge.
Anyone feeling like they would be up to this meat challenge, first think long and hard about it, then let me know and I will be happy to accompany you to the location...for encouragement purposes only though, no way in hell even I(an experienced meat eater)am brave enough to attempt this.
Where Are The Tunes?
Good things happen to good people
Last edited by shanny on Mar-20-2006 at 20:29
Mar-20-2006 20:23
Skipper
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2002
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
I've always wondered.... what exactly does PETA prepose we do with all the food stock if humans were to actually decide to all become vegetarians?
At a high level, the balance of existing animal "inventory" at farms/slaughter hourses would be processed as it would have anyways. the animals left in the wild would be left to breed naturally.
The amount of grain that is produced to feed animals meant for slaughter is astronomical. the amount of land used to raise these animals is crazy. The time, energy, money and environmental resources used *just* to raise animals for the sole purpose of slaughter boggles my mind when so many people are starving in the world.
Mar-20-2006 20:38
rabbitjoker
aural sadist
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Dark Dirty Tech Tribal. | Hands in air (trance) and feet on the floor (house).
Mar-20-2006 20:41
Moral Hazard
Oppressing the 99%
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: with the 1%
quote:
Originally posted by Skipper
At a high level, the balance of existing animal "inventory" at farms/slaughter hourses would be processed as it would have anyways.
I'm not sure I follow.... all live stock would be slaughtered despite the total lack of demand for meat? Who does PETA suspect will pay to transport the stock to the slaughter houses or slaughter them?
Mar-20-2006 20:42
Cuzo
Ninjaboot
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: I'm on your couch, eating your food
Anyone want to advice about any meat, I would happy to help them I have 5 years experience as a meat cutter...I'm not one anymore but I still love all beef, chicken, pork or fish.
PM me for advice.
___________________
"Everybody get together and feel alright!"
Robert Nesta Marley
Mar-20-2006 20:47
Skipper
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2002
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
I'm not sure I follow.... all live stock would be slaughtered despite the total lack of demand for meat? Who does PETA suspect will pay to transport the stock to the slaughter houses or slaughter them?
I think we're talking about different things. PETA doesn't assume the DEMAND for meat will disappear. but I expect if meat were going to be phased out of the food chain, the remaining animals left would be slaughtered as planned and consumed as planned, instead of pushing them out into the wild.
I don't think that even PETA considers this to be a realistic scenario to shoot for though. However, what most vegetarian and animal rights associations strive for is awareness. Awareness of the health consequences and environmental consequences. PETA chooses to use extreme shock tactics in their campaigns to do this.
Mar-20-2006 20:51
shanny
Ferocious One
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: in the jungle the mighty jungle
quote:
Originally posted by Cuzo
Anyone want to advice about any meat, I would happy to help them I have 5 years experience as a meat cutter...I'm not one anymore but I still love all beef, chicken, pork or fish.
PM me for advice.
Where Are The Tunes?
Good things happen to good people
Mar-20-2006 21:12
Abercrombie
myspace.com/ashesband
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Aurora Borealis
quote:
Originally posted by Skipper
but I expect if meat were going to be phased out of the food chain, the remaining animals left would be slaughtered as planned and consumed as planned, instead of pushing them out into the wild.
I don't think that even PETA considers this to be a realistic scenario to shoot for though. However, what most vegetarian and animal rights associations strive for is awareness. Awareness of the health consequences and environmental consequences. PETA chooses to use extreme shock tactics in their campaigns to do this.
I beg to differ... a PETA member will disagree with you. An immediate stop is the only option... slowly ending the food chain continues what PETA feels is senseless slaughter of animals. To them, it must stop now, and let all animals run free as they wish. Ask Ingrid Newkirk.
___________________
Short time TA, Long time Guver, Good time giver.
Mar-20-2006 22:43
Yohan
Champion of Deep&Nu-disco
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Kitchener, Ont, Soviet Canuckistan
quote:
Originally posted by Skipper
The time, energy, money and environmental resources used *just* to raise animals for the sole purpose of slaughter boggles my mind when so many people are starving in the world.
I'm more boggled at the amount of food being wasted and dumped when many people are starving.
-ET, proud member of PETA (People Enjoying Tasty Animals)
Originally posted by chinamon
not true. i say "ugh"
but i am a tranny.
quote:
Originally posted by kotsy
lol colour me retarded
Mar-20-2006 22:53
Skipper
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2002
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by EvilTree
I'm more boggled at the amount of food being wasted and dumped when many people are starving.
-ET, proud member of PETA (People Enjoying Tasty Animals)
How can you even say that when the biggest amount of food being wasted or dumped is animal products, or food being used to raise animals for slaughter?
Consider what we need to survive - we don't need meat to live. It is the only part of the diet that can be removed and replaced without any health consequences, aside from processed food items.
I don't understand your comment at all
Mar-20-2006 23:19
Abercrombie
myspace.com/ashesband
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Aurora Borealis
quote:
Originally posted by Skipper
How can you even say that when the biggest amount of food being wasted or dumped is animal products, or food being used to raise animals for slaughter?
Consider what we need to survive - we don't need meat to live. It is the only part of the diet that can be removed and replaced without any health consequences, aside from processed food items.
I don't understand your comment at all
You're right Skipper, but clarification is required. We don't need it to live. However PETA only supports a vegan lifestyle. It only temporarily tolerates vegetarians because it's an improvement over omnivores. Vegans MUST suppliment their diet through vitamin and nutritional supplements (www.vegansociety.com).
___________________
Short time TA, Long time Guver, Good time giver.
Mar-20-2006 23:30
Skipper
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2002
Location:
Agreed.
Don't get me wrong - I am very new to vegetarianism, and am incorporating it into my life at the rate that is comfortable and manageble to me. PETA goes wrong because it is SOOOO over the top, what they want from people and how they go about trying to change behaviour. Shocking images don't make people think as much as they make people turn away. It is silly, but people need to gently understand the consequences of their actions on this topic, and there are many other vegetarian awareness campaigns out there that are successful because they go about their business in a much more "tame" sort of way.
Personally I stopped eating meat as an experiment to see how meat was affecting my stomach problems that I was having - and I feel much better. But as I continue with it, I've done research into the other consequences of an animal diet and while I don't claim to be perfect, I think organizations like PETA need to recognize that even people's small changes (like mine - I still consume dairy, I haven't thrown out my leather purses) are making a difference.