|
| quote: | Originally posted by MichaelBoogerd!
good point, too bad it has absolutely no meaning here, i was there, i can make the tracklist, i can also judge the mixing, he made 49 transitions, 1 maybe loose, and 1 strange one between evergreen and do't forget me. The rest were spot on.
So er,...yeah sorry. But nice try. |
i think you didnt get my point after all. i didnt say it was a bad mix at all. i was trying to point out that judging a set by the tracklist is a bit silly because it depends how those tracks were put together.
anyway it doesnt matter cos i know ill just get lynched by the rest of the tiesto fans like yourself on here.
having seen and heard several tiesto sets this year, he is far from consistant at mixing fluently and im sure hardly anyone with an unbiased opinion can disagree.
ps, why do you have to be so anal with the "so, er, nice try"?, not every dj in the world is without fault or free from critisim no matter how much you like them. i like pvd and have done since 1998 but even i think he has been well below par over the last few years (with last year being an exception)and i wouldnt start flaming anyone who started saying anything critical towards him.
however back to my point, i still stand behind what i said about how easy it is to get carried away by a tracklist without actually hearing it( and i accept though you claim to have done as one of your 98 times since 2000, others have not but still say its a good set, hence my original post) and although "isoterra" was right about my link to oakenfold being a bit too far fetched, what i actually mean is that tiesto and the way his career is going is starting to echo how oakenfold has progressed over the last 7 years where now he feels he only has to turn up with minimal effort to do the job and everyone will be fine.
Last edited by charlie lloyd on Aug-06-2006 at 14:41
|