|
| quote: | Originally posted by *~LiSa-LoO~*
I'm almost afraid to post this, for fear of flaming!...but I will anyway. This is not necessarily my stance, but it's something that was brought up in the ethics class I mentioned I took last semester. I thought it would be an interesting thing to post to generate discussion.
In my class we talked about the issue of animals vs. humans. For instance, why are humans considered superior to animals? Is it because we have the ability to change our environments? Or that we have the capacity for language? Does this make humans "better"? Who are we to say that we are better than animals? Animals and other living things have been around just as long, if not longer than humans.
One of the reasons this was brought up was due to animal rights. Should there be laws against animal violence? Or do they not really matter? |
You bring up some good questions. Personally, I'd say that if not for our ability to significantly alter our environment and fashion/use tools we'd be a pretty crappy animal. Subsequently, I believe it is exactly those abilities that have resulted in our position a top the order of animals. With regard to animal rights legislation, I think this is necessary. Building from Ghandi's thinking that societies must be judged on how they treat their most vulnerable then if we want to be a just society we need to treat our animals humanely (humanely being a somewhat fluid concept as many animals are considered property and kept only for a purpose, which may not be objectly humane).
___________________
| quote: | Originally posted by RickyM
you're just a shit version of Moral Hazard. At least he knows what he's talking about. |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
lol, i love it when moral feels the need to lay the smack down 
|
|