|
I know settings can't be changed hence the idea for a whole new league. Personally, I think the expanded rosters (pg, g, sg, sf, f, f, pf, c, util, util or whatever it is) in head to head format is BY FAR the best (and most entertaining) way to do fantasy basketball. It allows for much more freedom which in turn creates more competition which in turn creates a lot more fun. The way the league is set up right now caters to the beginners of the beginners of the beginners. The options are so limited therefore I don't find there to be any sense of competition in this at all. I don't think doing a new league with a completely different draft would be that big of a hassle at this point. We've only played 10-12 games so far. There is still 5 more months left in the season + playoffs. The argument can be made that having had this brief preview we are in much better positions to pick (or pre-rank) our teams given how things have played out in the first couple weeks. IMO, this makes things a lot more interesting as well as competitive. The time it would take to do this is minimal at best. It takes all of 15 minutes to set your lineups for the week given who is playing and when etc etc. To me it seemed like the main issue for doing this format (as you said yourself when starting this thread Mark) was the time it would take to stay on top of this. As you have said in your recent posts it does not take up nearly as much time as you thought. We are talking a time commitment differential of like 10 minutes a week here.
Personally, I think the format we are in takes away from the fun of fantasy basketball and pretty much defeats the purpose of it completely.
This could be re-done very easily and quite quickly as well.
Next year is way too far away.
/endargument
___________________
We are the kids of the quiet revolution, and we fight for a new quiet concept of evolution. We play house music.
|