Yes, we supported many resistance groups in Afghanistan when the Soviets tried to take over the country. It's not like the US government said to itself "oh lets help this nice Bin Laden dude out". The Arab world at the time detested the Soviets, not the Americans. And yet, Bin Laden decided to bomb America and not Russia. Odd....

The terrorist organizations have caused damage in Israel, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt, places in Africa, Latin America, and so on and so forth.

quote:

Originally posted by CHRles Yes, we supported many resistance groups in Afghanistan when the Soviets tried to take over the country. It's not like the US government said to itself "oh lets help this nice Bin Laden dude out". The Arab world at the time detested the Soviets, not the Americans. And yet, Bin Laden decided to bomb America and not Russia. Odd.... The terrorist organizations have caused damage in Israel, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt, places in Africa, Latin America, and so on and so forth.

you are a manipulative piece of crap.

Its funny that you call them "RESISTANCE GROUPS" when it fits your argument... even though these people were horrible horrible religious fanatics that practiced Wahabism and were barbairc in their ways.. but to the US that wasnt an issue as long as Russia was out!


WHY DID THE ARAB WORLD DETEST THE SOVIETS CHRLES???? HMMMMM... I WONDER WHY?? They seemed to OCCUPY Afghanistan.... OCCUPY... do you know that word???? That sounds familiar in Iraq and Israel

So these terrorist organizations have bombed/terrorized Lebanese jordanians and Egyptians? EVEN AFRICANS??? WWOOOOOW.. please tell me how.. i would REAAAAAALLLY like to know!!!

For all i know.. Israel is the ONLY nation that has been "terrorized" by these organizations.

___________________
"This place isn't big enough for me to blow it up."
-MARCO V

quote:

Iran offers to help US stabilise Iraq -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LONDON — Iran would help the US stabilise Iraq if Washington set a timetable for the withdrawal of its troops, Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator said in a newspaper interview yesterday. “If they (the US) have a clear definition of a timetable, we’ll help them materialise it,” Ali Larijani said in the interview with Britain’s Financial Times. Larijani, the secretary of Iran’s supreme national security council, said that Washington’s failures in Iraq should deter the Bush administration from considering further foreign interventions, and warned the US to stay clear of Iran. He said that any attack by the US on Iran would be like Washington “sticking its hand into a beehive”. The US should attack Iran only if it wished “to receive Israel on a wheelchair”, he said . Larijani said the Bush administration should heed the strategy of both the Democratic Party and the British government . He said the Democrats’ call for a withdrawal timetable seemed “to be logical”. Britain has withdrawn its troops from the southern Iraqi port city of Basra, and a rough schedule for the complete withdrawal of its 5500 personnel from Iraq is emerging. Larijani said the British were “more intelligent than the Americans”, having made the “necessary adjustments” to their strategy. He said Iran was ready to continue co-operating with the United Nations (UN) atomic watchdog to defuse a row over its nuclear programme. On Friday, six world powers agreed to delay a vote on tougher UN sanctions against Iran until next month at the earliest, to wait for reports from the International Atomic Energy Agency and European negotiator Javier Solana. Reuters

http://www.businessday.co.za/news/w...MenuItem=BD4P16

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov http://www.businessday.co.za/news/w...MenuItem=BD4P16

I wonder how the U.S will react to this offer by Iran?

___________________
Mystic Mind - DJ Mixes
http://soundcloud.com/mystic-mind

Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/DJMysticMind

quote:

Originally posted by hardcore trancer I wonder how the U.S will react to this offer by Iran?

Bush has an agenda for the Middle East. And it does not involve dialogue with the "enemy".

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by Krypton Bush has an agenda for the Middle East. And it does not involve dialogue with the "enemy".

which makes so sense,I mean here they are arming and working with the Sunni's in Iraq.Technically Sunni's are the enemies too but I guess not anymore.

___________________
Mystic Mind - DJ Mixes
http://soundcloud.com/mystic-mind

Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/DJMysticMind

quote:

Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov http://www.businessday.co.za/news/w...MenuItem=BD4P16

Weren't these counties at each other's throats not that long ago?
A sudden change of heart now that Saddam isn't around?

They may have a current common annoyance in their region but I can't see centuries of rivarly suddenly being swept under the rug because of Iran's apathetic olive branch being offered...

They're simply trying to take advance of a situation they're already knee-deep in!

___________________
"...End? No, the journey doesn't end here. Death is just another path...one that we all must take.
The grey rain-curtain of this world rolls back, and all change to silver glass...and then you see it...
...white shores...and beyond...the far green country under a swift sunrise."

quote:

Originally posted by Fir3start3r Weren't these counties at each other's throats not that long ago? A sudden change of heart now that Saddam isn't around? They may have a current common annoyance in their region but I can't see centuries of rivarly suddenly being swept under the rug because of Iran's apathetic olive branch being offered... They're simply trying to take advance of a situation they're already knee-deep in!

For the most part, Iran just hated the Ba'athists. I think this signifies that Iran has noted that democracy in Iraq serves well their goal of creating a Shiite ally in the Middle East.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by LatinLover I mean I hear these phony things that Iran wont reach the capacity to be able to make Nuke weapons in X amount of years, YOU ARE LOST! No one knows the current status of their prog! Here is the thing that you people tend to forget. Please dont echo this bs "Iran has the right to have a program" ok but great responsibility comes if you want to reach that stage. Has Iran demonstrated to the world, that they are responsible and trustworthy to have such program? The UN has presented in the past with similar programs to reach the so called objective and Iran claims " for peaceful purposes" but they have rejected it. I mean Iran has not shown any seriousness to have such prog... here is why 1. They are promoting instability in the region by aiding terrorist 2. They have called for the destruction of Israel 3. They have this lunatic ideology of some religious phenomenon like Armageddon

fuckin shill. how does bush's cock taste?

___________________
stereoshift.org - Unifying people through musical celebrations; generating a moving and inspirational synergy.

Wouldn't it be interesting if the United States (secret services) was funding Iran's nuclear program?

Would you honestly be surprised, given recent history?

quote:

Originally posted by DJ Shibby Wouldn't it be interesting if the United States (secret services) was funding Iran's nuclear program? Would you honestly be surprised, given recent history?

The sad thing is, given the current state of affairs, it wouldn't be very surprising.

___________________
Poetry>Byron//Blog>TheMean

quote:

Orbax At that point you kind of crossed the rubicon and you might as well lay siege to Rome