Legalization of prostitution doesnt really matter to me,If something needs to be legalized its POT..

YES

I think that this is actually a pretty significant topic, given people's responses and justification to their views.

It seems to me that, whether you say yes or no, the real aim and reason behind your answer is more important, as it signifies your political reasoning in the matter.

The way I see it, it's not so much a matter of 'should prostitution be legalized?' so much as it is a matter of 'should prostitution be illegalized?'. What's the difference? Well, it seems to me that it comes down to whether or not you think that humans should be innately free to do what they want, unless it allows them to directly harm another person without the victim's consent or whether you think that humans should be kept in line by their government, everything should be regulated at all times because...well, fuck, I can't condone that sort of system, so I don't even know how to describe people's brand of logic behind it. The point? Humans' system of justice should be based upon the precept that humans should be allowed to do whatever they really want to at all times, and you put restrictions on it from there. Some people here, it seems like they would rather there be restrictions first and freedoms later. Careful not to let your corporate and public indoctrination get the better of you - people who make laws usually only have themselves in mind.

Recently some closet-roaming Senator was caught supposedley playing sex footsey with some guy in the stall net to him in a public restroom. The person happened to be an undercover police officer on a gay sex sting, and when word reached the media, the Senator's name was ruined; all the much more sweeter is the fact that this Senator was strongly republican and quite outspoken against gay rights. The Senator resigned, his career turned to a lie before everyone, his name ruined - yet he still has not confessed to being homosexual. The part of this story that bothered me the most is certainly not that we have gay politicians, not even that we have anti-gay rights Senators (however much I may disagree with them), but the fact that we have gay sex stings. Why in the FUCK is gay sex the law's business? Why in the FUCK is it the law's concern with what goes on behind locked doors when both parties are consenting? Because they can't tax it? Because we have certain outspoken puritan idiot fuckheads running the country? Because out of sight, out of mind isn't even enough in this case, there have to be laws prohibiting personal freedoms?

It's a much larger issue than just prostitution, I guess.

A friend of mine once said: "If the Government is intent upon making what goes on in the bedroom its business, it should be prepared to be fucked in the ass."

This friend was drunk.

The end.

___________________
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

quote:

Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On "If the Government is intent upon making what goes on in the bedroom its business, it should be prepared to be fucked in the ass."

thats awesome, im gonna remember that!

There are also no decent arguments against the legalisation of hooking. Its safer for the hookers, clients and the government gets to tax it.

___________________

Yes. If they want to fuck men/women for a living then so be it. It's their body anyways.As long as they get checked for STD's regularly.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by AustralianGQ im a failure with females...i will be the real 40 year old virgin i guarentee you

quote:

Originally posted by ikhouvanu As long as they get checked for STD's regularly.

I don't even think this should be a condition. Do I think that people should? Of course. Do I think that it should be another regulation upon people where they are punished by the government for not doing so? No way.

It comes down to personal responsibility, as so much of what is wrong in the US does. If you eat a hamburger that looks undercooked, even though your better judgment urged you against it, why are you allowed to sue the restaurant? If you are hurt in a car accident, can you suddenly sue the car manufacturer? why the hell is that? They didn't wreck your damn car. If you sleep with a cheap hooker and get a disease, who is to blame? You are for fucking someone you didn't know, you dumb bastard - why can people expect regulations to come rescue them all the time? It's a dependency that ends up costing money and resources that simply should not be wasted upon people by a mere service that should have little control other than exacting justice in order to keep people from killing one another.

___________________
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

quote:

Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On I don't even think this should be a condition. Do I think that people should? Of course. Do I think that it should be another regulation upon people where they are punished by the government for not doing so? No way. It comes down to personal responsibility, as so much of what is wrong in the US does. If you eat a hamburger that looks undercooked, even though your better judgment urged you against it, why are you allowed to sue the restaurant? If you are hurt in a car accident, can you suddenly sue the car manufacturer? why the hell is that? They didn't wreck your damn car. If you sleep with a cheap hooker and get a disease, who is to blame? You are for fucking someone you didn't know, you dumb bastard - why can people expect regulations to come rescue them all the time? It's a dependency that ends up costing money and resources that simply should not be wasted upon people by a mere service that should have little control other than exacting justice in order to keep people from killing one another.

you sound so young and idealistic. You need a reality checkz0rz!

How so?

___________________
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

quote:

Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On How so?

well its sounds like you think people have a sense of personal responsibility. that to me is idealistic cause in teh real world it is just the opposite.




and by real world I mean the places I have lived

quote:

Originally posted by Boomer187 teh real world

MTV taught me it's all idealistic.

Yeah, what I said was the complete opposite of that.

People don't have a sense of personal responsibility. I think that they should. Yes, it's idealistic to think that they ever truly could, I am just commenting on the fact that excessive legal safetynets for people make them depend on the Government for a great deal of things, and that this dependency does not foster an environment where people are actually incentivized to have some personal responsibility.

Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't have government completely abolished or something - that's not the answer. But this current state where Government systems seem to have a say in every human affair that goes on is simply not working.

___________________
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

A year ago I would have said "OMG PROSTITUTES ARE WHORES!" and probably would have vehemently defended how wrong it is to be a prostitute. But now I don't give a shit.