|
| quote: | Originally posted by Laeke
Huuuum.
Not so sure about that. The hobbyist musician has not the same access to hardware, studios, competent professionals to help him. Even in electronic music, software solutions are not the same, no matter how complete they may be, not to mention the other genres where you have to actually possess an instrument.
A pro musician will have 2 to 3 times more hours to actually focus on its art. I think that for a majority of them it is actually a big plus.
Out of your ten favorite tracks this year, is there an "hobbyist musician" among the artists? Honest question, really... |
I don't think that being a pro musician helps that much... I mean, now with a laptop you can make music everywhere, whenever you want. It's pure snobbery to consider that working in a full-packed studio will change the artistic process. It will perhaps change how creative we will be, but when you are in an artistic mood, you can make art with anything you can master. And laptop are sufficient enough to do so.
In a more philosophic way, I consider that musicians should never be pro, making music in order to make a living would annoy me a lot. I have a good friend who work in a studio & must make the post-production for r&b dickheads or 0 IQ DJs. There is something sacred in arts. I think that the best artists are the happy-few who can express their mind out of art without the boundaries of our consumerist society, who can touch what Merleau-Ponty called "our stormed, mankindly shared deeper Being".
|