 |
|
|
|
 |
Halcyon+On+On
Liebchen

Registered: Sep 2004
Location: midcoast
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by JD8180
edit: and yes, there are some cheap alternatives like tuna and stuff like that, but there are PLENTY more cheap unhealthy foods right next to it. |
While that may very well be true, I think the point Ygrene was making was that it's completely possible to sustain yourself on very healthy, cheap foods. And really, what other purpose for food is there other than mere nourishment?
aha.
Thought of an answer?
Food is awesome. It tastes great when made properly and some of it is really quite pleasing to our senses - there's an entire culture of food out there within the consumer culture - in fact, one might even argue that cuisine is the complete basis for consumerism in the first place. Like almost every 'civilised' endeavour, mere survival is not enough. It must be pleasing to our senses as well as our cultural sensibilities. It just so happens that western nations tend to hold consumerism quite high, and so the transmission of solipsistic behaviour does not cease, especially when it is paraded about as something "necessary" by those with everything to gain by making everyone gain, so to speak.
I can't believe how many people seem to hold onto the three square meals a day of meat n' potatoes routine. You just don't need to eat that much. Especially if you aren't going to use the calories at all.
___________________
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
|
|
Nov-26-2007 04:51
|
|
|
 |
 |
MrJiveBoJingles
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Jun 2004
Location: U.S.
|
|
|
| quote: | | Myth: Lots of poor people are fat… they're not suffering. |
Nobody has said that poor people are "not suffering."
| quote: | | Dr. Martin Seligman, an authority on obesity, writes: "Nineteen out of twenty studies show that obese people consume no more calories each day than non-obese people. In one remarkable experiment, a group of very obese people dieted down to only 60 percent overweight and stayed there. They needed one hundred fewer calories a day to stay at 60 percent overweight than normal people needed to stay at a normal weight." |
Indeed, but the article draws the wrong conclusion from this data. It is not that "genes make people fat," but that genes result in different caloric requirements and different amounts of food needed for satiety. Many people have lower caloric requirements (like those cited by the doctor), but do not adjust their diets accordingly. They certainly will not be helped in making this adjustment by stupid and false theories of genetic determinism.
First, thin people in obese families are rare, but they do exist, and their existence gives the lie to this sort of empty-headed theorizing.
Second, obesity has increased massively just in the past twenty years (an increase of at least twenty percent). Surely the writer of the site would not contend either that "fat genes" have increased dramatically in those twenty years or that far more people in the U.S. were simply starving twenty years ago, since both of those assertions are easily proved false.
So, what hope for genetic determinism?
|
|
Nov-26-2007 16:28
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:56.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|