quote:

Originally posted by RickyM I don't see how being unable to prove something exists is a valid argument for believing it does...that's what I believe the spaghetti monster and the celestial teapot were designed to show. And you use logic and reason to conclude that it is extremely unlikely that the spaghetti monster exists, due to lack of evidence. I apply the same logic to the idea of a god existing.

I don't see how being unable to produce physical evidence of the existance of a thing is reason to believe it exists either, my faith is a result of reason. I don't have faith because the existance of God hasn't been disproven, rather, I have faith because I have deductively reasoned that God (in some fashion I cannot fully appreciate) exists. The key here is that I believe, I do not profess to know.

This is where I take issue with athiesm... athiests state there is no god... they state this as fact, not belief. I can accept someone stating they do not believe there is anything that we would understand as a god, I can even appreciate there are sound reasons for that belief; however, belief is not knowledge nor is it fact. To state with absolute certainty that something does not exist is simply folly. This is why I state that any intelligent person who does not have faith is more probably to deem themself an agnostic and admit that they don't know one way or another.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by RickyM you're just a shit version of Moral Hazard. At least he knows what he's talking about.

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN lol, i love it when moral feels the need to lay the smack down

That was a very insightful article. It gives me much more respect for the Jewish people and not so much for the Christians.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN dont argue with the yanks nutter, they know best!

quote:

Originally posted by eROs.au That was a very insightful article. It gives me much more respect for the Jewish people and not so much for the Christians.

You may wish to also consider this artical is completely one sided and does not discuss any of the prophesies concerning the mesiah that do ring true regarding Jesus. Additionally, much of this is based on interpretation... for example, the actual wording of Genesis 49:10 is "The scepter will not depart from Judah, nor the ruler's staff from between his feet, until he comes to whom it belongs[1] and the obedience of the nations is his." Joseph(according to the gospels) was a decendant of Judah. Interestingly, the jewish belief appears to enter a paradox here... they do not believe Jesus to be the son of god (therefore Joseph must be his biological father) but do state that he cannot be the mesiah because he is not a decendant of Judah.... well, if Joseph is his father then he's a decendant of Judah.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by RickyM you're just a shit version of Moral Hazard. At least he knows what he's talking about.

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN lol, i love it when moral feels the need to lay the smack down

quote:

Originally posted by Moral Hazard This is where I take issue with athiesm... athiests state there is no god... they state this as fact, not belief. I can accept someone stating they do not believe there is anything that we would understand as a god, I can even appreciate there are sound reasons for that belief; however, belief is not knowledge nor is it fact. To state with absolute certainty that something does not exist is simply folly. This is why I state that any intelligent person who does not have faith is more probably to deem themself an agnostic and admit that they don't know one way or another.

I wouldn't be certain that Atheists state it as a fact, I would say that their 'beliefs' are the opposite of yours, i.e. You believe that there is a god, atheists would believe that there is no God...

I'm aware that there are different types / levels of atheism, so perhaps you were referring to 'Strong atheism' as those who state the non-existence of God as a fact. Agnosticism can also lean towards atheism, or lean towards the belief of a God. Being clearly a learned chap, I'm sure you realise that atheists beliefs or lack of beliefs are not always black and white ... much the same as Christians really.
It's the arrogant fools who claim themselves to be 100% correct, that I take issue with, be they religious or atheists. I think this was your point too, so we're probably agreeing.

At the minute I'd consider myself agnostic, leaning more towards the non-existence of a god. I would also consider the idea that there could be a god, but he does not make himself known to us, or interfere in anyway.
You mentioned before that you researched and read for a long time before finally settling on your religion...what differed about Christianity that made you choose it over other religions? If you don't mind my asking.

___________________
Signature Suspended as it was deemed offensive

quote:

Originally posted by RickyM You mentioned before that you researched and read for a long time before finally settling on your religion...what differed about Christianity that made you choose it over other religions? If you don't mind my asking.

Very little, to be honest. The more familure I became with the various religions (to be fair I really only examined the great world religions... the Abrihamic and Vedic religious families) I studied the more it appeared to me that they were essentially telling the same story and proscribing the same ethical/moral codes. The differences that, on the surface, appear quite glaring are really little more then stylistic or interpretive differences... which appear to be consistant with an attempt by the diety(s) to tailor their revelations within a frame of referance that the persons to whom the revalation was being made would be able to understand (which seems like a logical move on the diety's part). This is probably why I have a great deal of respect for all the great religions and would never suggest that one is more correct then another. Ultimately, my decision was not between what image of God I thought was correct; rather, it was between what style of worship I found most appealing. Given that I grew up in a country that is predominately Christian (specifically Roman Catholic) I think it's only natural that this is the style of worship that I connected with most strongly.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by RickyM you're just a shit version of Moral Hazard. At least he knows what he's talking about.

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN lol, i love it when moral feels the need to lay the smack down

quote:

Originally posted by Moral Hazard I don't see how being unable to produce physical evidence of the existance of a thing is reason to believe it exists either, my faith is a result of reason. I don't have faith because the existance of God hasn't been disproven, rather, I have faith because I have deductively reasoned that God (in some fashion I cannot fully appreciate) exists. The key here is that I believe, I do not profess to know. This is where I take issue with athiesm... athiests state there is no god... they state this as fact, not belief. I can accept someone stating they do not believe there is anything that we would understand as a god, I can even appreciate there are sound reasons for that belief; however, belief is not knowledge nor is it fact. To state with absolute certainty that something does not exist is simply folly. This is why I state that any intelligent person who does not have faith is more probably to deem themself an agnostic and admit that they don't know one way or another.

FYI i DO accept the possibility that god does exist, just that it is incredibly unlikely. but in any case, my atheism is really more about opposing religion and its influence outside the self, rather than some unshakable "anti faith" in god. i think the existence of god is less important to human kind than the very real problems caused by worship and belief that we all see every day.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by Moral Hazard Very little, to be honest. The more familure I became with the various religions (to be fair I really only examined the great world religions... the Abrihamic and Vedic religious families) I studied the more it appeared to me that they were essentially telling the same story and proscribing the same ethical/moral codes.

i don't think that paraphrasing or plagiarising other belief systems is a reason to believe however.

___________________

I was just sort of poking fun at the idea of writing "G-d" as if not to write "God" when its obvious what is being written.

But OK, this is pretty interesting. I'm with Moral Hazard

I thought this was interesting about Jesus as the messiah from the texts..

quote:

Born of a Virgin Isaiah 7:14, "Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel." Matt. 1:18,25, "This is how the birth of Jesus Christ came about : His mother Mary...was found to be with child through the Holy Spirit... But he had no union with her until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus." ================================================================= Son of God Psalm 2:7, "I will proclaim the decree of the LORD: He said to me, 'You are my Son, today I have become your Father.'" Matt. 3:15, "And a voice from heaven said, 'This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased.'" ================================================================== Seed of Abraham Gen. 22:18, "and through your offspring all nations on earth will be blessed, because you have obeyed me." Matt. 1:1, "record of the genealogy of Jesus Christ the son of David, the son of Abraham." ================================================================== Son of Isaac Gen. 21:12, "But God said to him, 'Do not be so distressed about the boy and your maidservant. Listen to whatever Sarah tells you, because it is through Isaac that your offspring will be reckoned.'" Luke 3:23-34, "Now Jesus himself was about thirty years old when he began his ministry. He was the son, so it was thought, of Joseph, the son of Heli...the son of Jacob, the son of Isaac, the son of Abraham, the son of Terah, the son of Nahor." =================================================================== House of David Jer. 23:1, "The days are coming, declares the LORD, 'when I will raise up to David a righteous Branch, a King who will reign wisely and do what is just and right in the land.'" Luke 3:23-31, "Now Jesus himself was about thirty years old when he began his ministry. He was the son, so it was thought, of Joseph, the son of Heli...the son of Mattatha, the son of Nathan, the son of David." =================================================================== Born at Bethlehem Micah 5:2 "But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times." Matt. 2:1, "After Jesus was born in Bethlehem in Judea, during the time of King Herod, Magi from the east came to Jerusalem." =================================================================== He shall be a Prophet Deut. 18:18, "I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their brothers; I will put my words in his mouth, and he will tell them everything I command him." Matt. 21:11,"The crowds answered, 'This is Jesus, the prophet from Nazareth in Galilee.'" ==================================================================== He shall be a Priest Psalm 110:4, "The LORD has sworn and will not change his mind: 'You are a priest forever, in the order of Melchizedek.'" Heb. 3:1, "Therefore, holy brothers, who share in the heavenly calling, fix your thoughts on Jesus, the apostle and high priest whom we confess." Heb. 5:5-6, "So Christ also did not take upon himself the glory of becoming a high priest. But God said to him, 'You are my Son; today I have become your Father.' And he says in another place, 'You are a priest forever, in the order of Melchizedek.'" ==================================================================== He shall be a King Psalm 2:6, "I have installed my King on Zion, my holy hill." Matt. 27:37, "Above his head they placed the written charge against him: THIS IS JESUS, THE KING OF THE JEWS." ================================================================ He shall judge Isaiah 33:22, "For the LORD is our judge, the LORD is our lawgiver, the LORD is our king; it is he who will save us." John 5:30, "By myself I can do nothing; I judge only as I hear, and my judgment is just, for I seek not to please myself but him who sent me." =================================================================== He would be preceded by a Messenger Isaiah 40:3, "A voice of one calling: 'In the desert prepare the way for the LORD; make straight in the wilderness a highway for our God.'" Matt. 3:1-2, "In those days John the Baptist came, preaching in the Desert of Judea and saying, 'Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is near.'" ================================================================ Rejected by His own people Isaiah 53:3, "He was despised and rejected by men, a man of sorrows, and familiar with suffering. Like one from whom men hide their faces he was despised, and we esteemed him not." John 7:5, "For even his own brothers did not believe in him." John 7:48, "Have any of the rulers or the Pharisees believed in Him?" ========================================================= His side pierced Zech. 12:10, "And I will pour out on the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem a spirit of grace and supplication. They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for an only child, and grieve bitterly for him as one mourns for an only son." John 19:34, "Instead, one of the soldiers pierced Jesus' side with a spear, bringing a sudden flow of blood and water." ================================================================== Crucifixion Psalm 22:1, Psalm 22:11-18, "For the director of music. To the tune of "The Doe of the Morning." A psalm of David. My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?...Do not be far from me, for trouble is near and there is no one to help. Many bulls surround me; strong bulls of Bashan. Dogs have surrounded me; a band of evil men has encircled me, they have pierced my hands and my feet. I can count all my bones; people stare and gloat over me. They divide my garments among them and cast lots for my clothing." Luke 23:33, "When they came to the place called the Skull, there they crucified him, along with the criminals -- one on his right, the other on his left." John 19:33, "But when they came to Jesus and saw that He was already dead, they did not break His legs." John 19:23-24, "When the soldiers crucified Jesus, they took his clothes, dividing them into four shares, one for each of them, with the undergarment remaining. This garment was seamless, woven in one piece from top to bottom. 'Let's not tear it,' they said to one another. 'Let's decide by lot who will get it.' This happened that the scripture might be fulfilled which said, 'They divided my garments among them and cast lots for my clothing.' So this is what the soldiers did."

"I give hope that this will clear the clouds of your blurred thought." (Leon TA:COR) :O
http://www.jewsforjudaism.org/jews-...esus-index.html

___________________
http://french-express.com
http://discodust.blogspot.com

quote:

Originally posted by Krypton I thought this was interesting about Jesus as the messiah from the texts..

Seems like almost all of those are from books written after Jesus' death.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN dont argue with the yanks nutter, they know best!