 |
|
|
|
 |
Member of X
Loving Trance Since 1998

Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA (block from ocean)
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by OurManFlint
Just like the US annihilates everyone in basketball, baseball, etc?? The US can't even win championships in their own sports. True, some of the best athletes are Americans. But that's only because the geography of the US allows for more diverse activity and the pot of athletes is bigger because it has a larger population than most countries. It has nothing to do with American superiority. It's like comparing a small school to a huge school. Ofcourse the huge school is going to have, in general, better athletes. |
That's because our wealth of athletes is spread over a multitude of sports. HENCE my rationale. I think about it this way, we really don't give a shit about soccer but we are at least a competitive team in the world. We have a large population but not a large population of serious soccer players.
The State of California would have won the 4th most olympic medals in the world if they were a separate country. They'd be the world's 4th largest economy in the world as well. We are 50 million people. A large sum but would place us 24th in the world for population. In reality, it's a matter of economics if you want to get serious.
Using your rationale in a direct linear path, China should obviously be the best sports country in the world. India #2. Therefore, your logic needed much more rationale. Brazil has 186 million people and they are good at? Soccer. And? ...........Funny how that population advantage is never pointed out with them in regards to soccer. However, obviously if they were a richer country they would more than likely be more of a dominating force in athletics in other sports besides soccer.
I pretty much did what I wanted to do and that was to get a serious response to an obvious mocking tone by the way.
___________________
Yankees
Rams
Blazers
Man U
Oregon Ducks
|
|
Feb-20-2008 05:51
|
|
|
 |
 |
RJT
last minute disco

Registered: Oct 2004
Location:
|
|
|
Feb-20-2008 05:54
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
OurManFlint
P(x) =

Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Member of X
Using your rationale in a direct linear path, China should obviously be the best sports country in the world. India #2. Therefore, your logic needed much more rationale. Brazil has 186 million people and they are good at? Soccer. And? ...........Funny how that population advantage is never pointed out with them in regards to soccer. However, obviously if they were a richer country they would more than likely be more of a dominating force in athletics in other sports besides soccer. |
That wasn't my rational. Look at which programs in each country are supported highly. The US has a lot more diverse athletic programs supported than India, China, Brasil, etc. India is a force in Cricket, and that program is highly supported. So, along with a large population, they are good at it. The US, not so good, if anybody even plays cricket in the US.
How many people does India bring to the winter olympics? Look at their geography, not as supportive as it is in the US, now is it? My argument did not stem only from population. There are other factors at play.
| quote: | Originally posted by Member of X
I pretty much did what I wanted to do and that was to get a serious response to an obvious mocking tone by the way. | I have heard the same thing being said by many people, in class, media, etc. So forgive mua, this is the first opportunity I've had to express my opinion about the matter.
|
|
Feb-20-2008 06:22
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:54.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|