Originally posted by Sushipunk
Not too sure, I've never had a Nikon before. What's your budget?
Well this is 22|22 hindsight I bought it. I got it for £270 or $540 (us) , $580 (Oz Money).
Actually why do you use $ in Oz? Surely it should be Oz £?
___________________
If you can read this, I'm seriously fucking bored.
Mar-07-2008 04:38
Sushipunk
Flickering, I roam
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Chateau Verdafloor
quote:
Originally posted by Dervish
Well this is 22|22 hindsight I bought it. I got it for £270 or $540 (us) , $580 (Oz Money).
Actually why do you use $ in Oz? Surely it should be Oz £?
Ah, I see. Well, I'm sure it's not a shit camera. I think that lenses make more difference personally (along with photographic ability/composition lol). What it comes down to is whether it will do the stuff you want it to.
And we ditched the pound a long time ago The queen'll be next!
___________________
Mar-07-2008 04:44
Dervish
Your opinion matters.
Registered: Dec 2003
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by Sushipunk
Ah, I see. Well, I'm sure it's not a shit camera. I think that lenses make more difference personally (along with photographic ability/composition lol). What it comes down to is whether it will do the stuff you want it to.
And we ditched the pound a long time ago The queen'll be next!
Hmm it's a Nikon DX - AF-Snikkor 18-55mm 1.35-5.6GII ED one prob with this cam is that to be AF it need to have a motor in the lens.
But it is smaller than a lot of SLRs.
And hurahhhh on ditching being a subject! I am a Scot after all. But... my fav line ever is a prince phillip one (to PM Howard):
quote:
You don't have a king so you can not become a kingdom, you haven't a prince so you can not become a principality. I wholeheartedly suggest that you remain a country.
___________________
If you can read this, I'm seriously fucking bored.
Mar-07-2008 04:51
Sushipunk
Flickering, I roam
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Chateau Verdafloor
Awesome line.
___________________
Mar-07-2008 04:55
shaw
RIP
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Intergalactic Mimosa Station
should've gone for the d40x. have fun finding lenses.
zing?
Mar-07-2008 05:13
Dervish
Your opinion matters.
Registered: Dec 2003
Location:
Meh prob a phase, maybe zing in that I'll dump it in about a week
Also even my booze addled mind knows that all lenses will work just not with AF. And also have found that AF sucks. You get way better results doing it yourself. (so far anyway lol)
___________________
If you can read this, I'm seriously fucking bored.
Mar-07-2008 05:17
Sushipunk
Flickering, I roam
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Chateau Verdafloor
quote:
Originally posted by Dervish
And also have found that AF sucks. You get way better results doing it yourself. (so far anyway lol)
Depends what you're photographing. I'm mainly shooting birdlife, so I would be fucked without fast AF.
___________________
Mar-07-2008 05:18
Dervish
Your opinion matters.
Registered: Dec 2003
Location:
Does it work well that far put?
___________________
If you can read this, I'm seriously fucking bored.
Mar-07-2008 05:20
shaw
RIP
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Intergalactic Mimosa Station
it would be one thing if you just couldn't use autofocus, instead of being banned from all lenses that happen to be capable of it.
on a related note, I have 0 functioning digital cameras now, and have for some time. I'm thinking 870, g9, or just being excessive & going for a 40d. I'm leaning towards the g9...
Mar-07-2008 05:25
Dervish
Your opinion matters.
Registered: Dec 2003
Location:
Not sure I like your tine fella. Blahhhh it's not like I'm going to be buying 101 lenses. Since the whole kit cost me prob the cost of a proper lens above a true point and shoot I'm not too fussed.
That said I know what you're saying. Which is why I was really considering the Pentax, but this apparently is stronger for learners like myself (so the interweb said).
___________________
If you can read this, I'm seriously fucking bored.
Mar-07-2008 05:31
Sushipunk
Flickering, I roam
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Chateau Verdafloor
quote:
Originally posted by inconspicuous
it would be one thing if you just couldn't use autofocus, instead of being banned from all lenses that happen to be capable of it.
on a related note, I have 0 functioning digital cameras now, and have for some time. I'm thinking 870, g9, or just being excessive & going for a 40d. I'm leaning towards the g9...
The G9 is supposed to be pretty fucking awesome. And, if you buy a 40D, you'll be spending a shitload on lenses. Because there's always a better one
___________________
Mar-07-2008 05:36
Dervish
Your opinion matters.
Registered: Dec 2003
Location:
Hmmm camera talk, D40 vs 40D? lol
___________________
If you can read this, I'm seriously fucking bored.