Well, sorta... to be fair, I just "plus one'ed" the Amba one.
Apr-02-2008 18:56
Stasis
41º 42' N, 86º 10' W
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: New England
I went through a short lived kinda gimmicky phrase where I played a lot of proggy tunes pitched waaaay down to around 110 bpm, so they came out really trippy and druggy. Usually the more melodic they were, the better. I built a mix around Sasha's remix of Depeche Mode - Precious pitched down around there, but as I said, it was kinda a gimmick--just regular tunes listened to in a different way.
Originally posted by Stasis
I went through a short lived kinda gimmicky phrase where I played a lot of proggy tunes pitched waaaay down to around 110 bpm, so they came out really trippy and druggy. Usually the more melodic they were, the better. I built a mix around Sasha's remix of Depeche Mode - Precious pitched down around there, but as I said, it was kinda a gimmick--just regular tunes listened to in a different way.
Kinda like taking tracks that are meant at 45 but playing them at 33. Sometimes you actually get a better track lol!
Apr-02-2008 20:53
Haak
analog evading shark
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: Oslo, Norway
quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
I never really found the BPM to be a factor for me - a tune is a tune no matter how it's pitched.
The only problem I've ever had has been trying to match the wildly varying BPM's together while mixing, but...
I'm the same. Although i do remember pitching Gecko - Flugmaschiene up tp + 6% and going mental.
Originally posted by Guest
And if you had posted this on page 1, this thread would have been shutdown, owned, done for kaput...because you're exactly right.
Not really. There are tracks I've heard first at their original tempo and then later heard pitched up or down by a DJ and thought "That sounds better".
