 |
|
|
|
 |
studiobob
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: May 2009
Location:
|
|
|
just in response to the earlier posts about the source material being the same. a wav file ie source, pressed onto vinyl WILL sound better. not by a great deal, but it will. because to get from your computer running perhaps 24bit audio to a 16 bit cd. effectively "digitises" the track even more, so your chopping the track up into little bits. you put it on vinyl and there is no chopping, its a pure analog waveform. so regardless of what mastering is done on a track, it will sound better on vinyl. and if you've turned the wav into a mp3, even at 320 kpbs you've compressed a 100MB wav into 20MB file or whatever size, there IS some loss, not very noticable but compared to a vinyl version of the same track, you should be able to spot the difference. mainly in the extreme highs and lows.
a good mastering house will pass the wav file which is 24 bit at the very least out through very expensive AD convertors, through racks of gear and then store on an analog medium like DAT maybe and then press to vinyl. so no more AD conversion in the chain, which leaves you with a much purer signal than if you did the same mastering process but had to convert BACK to 16 bit for CD.
all good fun 
___________________
www.soundcloud.com/iainsanderson
|
|
Aug-14-2009 11:39
|
|
|
 |
 |
Bayou Boy
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Louisiana
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by sixofour.604
People act as if being mp3 vs vinyl or being mastered is what makes or breaks a track, sorry, but if a track is good, the minor details don't mean much, and if the track is bad, putting glitter won't change it, tiesto. |
+1 ...like a mofo!
|
|
Aug-14-2009 23:46
|
|
|
 |
 |
derail
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by CLICK_RAREVINYL
But regardless of sidechaining the electronic music genre has always been the loudest of them all sixofour. |
This hasn't been my experience. Yes, it's up against it, and on average has become even louder in the last few years, but the kick drum is a big limiting factor in terms of pushing the loudness up even higher.
Rock and pop music don't have that limitation, they can have tiny kicks and masses of midrange, which will be much louder, comparatively.
As other people have said, nobody is forcing us to do this to our own music. There are some artists who use a wider dynamic range. Not all trance is subject to the loudness war. Just most of it.
|
|
Aug-15-2009 03:52
|
|
|
 |
 |
mfitterer1
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2008
Location: Oregon
|
|
|
Dude it's not as bad as everyone makes it out to be. I have listened to tons of genres in depth and trance is one of the better production wise. It's up there in the loudness but when you are making tracks for people to dance to; isn't that kind of to be expected that people will take it a little too far?
Anyway there are ways to avoid it. If you're mixing you simply don't turn the track up as loud when you're using it. If you're casually listening, ipods have normalizers on them now and i'm sure WMP will very soon.
|
|
Aug-15-2009 10:22
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:30.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|