Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > What's it take to get a vinyl release these days
Pages (5): « 1 2 3 4 [5]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
CLICK_RAREVINYL
Suspended User



Registered: Feb 2009
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by sixofour.604
I'll tell him I came from DogsOnAcid




Bitching about the loudness war on the production forum of tranceaddict is like protesting porn while running a sex shop. It is going to make you look silly.


___________________
STOP!!! ARE YOU A DJ??? Find DJ Tiësto Paul Van Dyk Ferry Corsten Daft Punk Prodigy Armin Van Buuren Paul Oakenfold Sasha & Digweed Jeff Mills Richie Hawtin Carl Cox Global Underground And Much More... All The Classics You Always Wanted On Vinyl & CD For Cheap. 50 records added daily don't Miss Out...[/COLOR]

Old Post Aug-14-2009 05:47  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for CLICK_RAREVINYL Click here to Send CLICK_RAREVINYL a Private Message Visit CLICK_RAREVINYL's homepage! Add CLICK_RAREVINYL to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
studiobob
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: May 2009
Location:

just in response to the earlier posts about the source material being the same. a wav file ie source, pressed onto vinyl WILL sound better. not by a great deal, but it will. because to get from your computer running perhaps 24bit audio to a 16 bit cd. effectively "digitises" the track even more, so your chopping the track up into little bits. you put it on vinyl and there is no chopping, its a pure analog waveform. so regardless of what mastering is done on a track, it will sound better on vinyl. and if you've turned the wav into a mp3, even at 320 kpbs you've compressed a 100MB wav into 20MB file or whatever size, there IS some loss, not very noticable but compared to a vinyl version of the same track, you should be able to spot the difference. mainly in the extreme highs and lows.
a good mastering house will pass the wav file which is 24 bit at the very least out through very expensive AD convertors, through racks of gear and then store on an analog medium like DAT maybe and then press to vinyl. so no more AD conversion in the chain, which leaves you with a much purer signal than if you did the same mastering process but had to convert BACK to 16 bit for CD.

all good fun


___________________
www.soundcloud.com/iainsanderson

Old Post Aug-14-2009 11:39  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for studiobob Click here to Send studiobob a Private Message Visit studiobob's homepage! Add studiobob to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
david.michael
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Dayton, OH, USA

quote:
Originally posted by CLICK_RAREVINYL
But regardless of sidechaining the electronic music genre has always been the loudest of them all sixofour.


I dunno, metal is pretty insane in this regard... especially the really hardcore stuff.

quote:
Bitching about the loudness war on the production forum of tranceaddict is like protesting porn while running a sex shop. It is going to make you look silly.


I'm gonna disagree with this. A sex shop is going to contain porn inherently. Electronic music does not have to be squashed to all oblivion... that's just the common trend. (As with most current music.)

Old Post Aug-14-2009 12:35  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for david.michael Click here to Send david.michael a Private Message Visit david.michael's homepage! Add david.michael to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
MrJiveBoJingles
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2004
Location: U.S.

quote:
Originally posted by david.michael
I'm gonna disagree with this. A sex shop is going to contain porn inherently. Electronic music does not have to be squashed to all oblivion... that's just the common trend. (As with most current music.)

Exactly. I tend to avoid compression in most cases, but then again I can get away with it because most of the time I'm not making clubby tracks.



Also, one thing people sometimes forget is that vinyl mastering is different because of the loudness limitations of the vinyl medium itself. It's simply impossible to totally squash a song if it's going to be pressed to vinyl, because the record won't play properly if the audio is too squashed as much as on some digital recordings. If that physical limitation weren't in place, who knows what engineers would have been pushed to do back in the day?

Old Post Aug-14-2009 15:07  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for MrJiveBoJingles Click here to Send MrJiveBoJingles a Private Message Add MrJiveBoJingles to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Bayou Boy
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Louisiana

quote:
Originally posted by sixofour.604
People act as if being mp3 vs vinyl or being mastered is what makes or breaks a track, sorry, but if a track is good, the minor details don't mean much, and if the track is bad, putting glitter won't change it, tiesto.



+1 ...like a mofo!

Old Post Aug-14-2009 23:46  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Bayou Boy Click here to Send Bayou Boy a Private Message Add Bayou Boy to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
derail
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia

quote:
Originally posted by CLICK_RAREVINYL
But regardless of sidechaining the electronic music genre has always been the loudest of them all sixofour.


This hasn't been my experience. Yes, it's up against it, and on average has become even louder in the last few years, but the kick drum is a big limiting factor in terms of pushing the loudness up even higher.

Rock and pop music don't have that limitation, they can have tiny kicks and masses of midrange, which will be much louder, comparatively.

As other people have said, nobody is forcing us to do this to our own music. There are some artists who use a wider dynamic range. Not all trance is subject to the loudness war. Just most of it.

Old Post Aug-15-2009 03:52  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for derail Click here to Send derail a Private Message Add derail to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
mfitterer1
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jul 2008
Location: Oregon

Dude it's not as bad as everyone makes it out to be. I have listened to tons of genres in depth and trance is one of the better production wise. It's up there in the loudness but when you are making tracks for people to dance to; isn't that kind of to be expected that people will take it a little too far?

Anyway there are ways to avoid it. If you're mixing you simply don't turn the track up as loud when you're using it. If you're casually listening, ipods have normalizers on them now and i'm sure WMP will very soon.

Old Post Aug-15-2009 10:22  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for mfitterer1 Click here to Send mfitterer1 a Private Message Add mfitterer1 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > What's it take to get a vinyl release these days
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (5): « 1 2 3 4 [5]  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackID from a raver video (eric liquid rave) [2004] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackViframa - "Cristalle (Katana's Intro Mix)" [2003]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 19:30.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!