|
| quote: | Originally posted by Q5echo
i see what you're trying to imply and on the surface is understadable, but you just touched the surface about what i was thinking.
Russia's incursion into Georgia, regardless of their reasoning, represented a renewed existential threat to former Soviet satelites like the Ukraine and Georgia ect. that harkened back to the glory days of the Cold War. something completely different and much more concderning to the world as a whole than whats going on today in the ME.
admitedly, i was wrong. a lot of us were, as Russia pulled right back out although they took their sweet time...it's Russia after all
if you looked back through that thread i never discussed proportionality. Russia was smart in using overwhelming force from the outset. thats how you control the situation to your advantage and minimize exposure. i was concerned about motive not proportionality.
in this latest case with Israel and Hamas, which is COMPLETEY different tactically as well as strategically, i have yet to Israel invade Gaza like Russia did in Georgia. but it's early
if you want to study a more similar parallel look at the Israeli/Hezbollah war in the summer of 2006. i think i have been consistent in my views for the last 2 and a half years |
I understand where you are coming from, and I agree that Russia needed to use its massive force to control that situation quickly.
On the other hand, Georgia for the most part was a legitimate military force in uniform and on a much closer playing field to Russia.
Hamas is basically small time chumps with some shitty home made rockets and old soviet katyushas. Using F-16s and dropping ordinance from thirty thousand feet is a bit over kill.
I am not saying that Israel shouldn't be in there trying to defend itself, but when their biggest concern, as an Israeli spokesperson on CNN just said, "children wetting their bed" I do not think F-16s are the way to handle the situation.
|